Grames Gernot wrote:
Hi,
So far, if have understand correctly: I route the incoming tcpip message of
port 8099 directly to 8080 and then the ingress filter on port 8099 has
nothing to do!?
Yes I think on different interface on one machine (different Ports for
different Request, with different restr
I have been testing wondershaper 1.1a with htb.
DOWNLINK=2304
UPLINK=1024
DEV=wlan0
No other changes have been made, except to comment out the 2 lines to
allow the script to run.
When I do a speed test from sites like www.toast.net/performance, I only
get speeds equal to my UPLINK speed. I expe
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:15:19AM +0200, Michael Renzmann wrote:
> I agree, but I also see no reason to have this discussion arising over
> and over again. Local filtering should do the trick until that moron
> understands that it is a bad idea to automatic ansers to the spoofed
> sender of a v
Daniel Dafoe wrote:
I really don't get it :
Recompiled my kernel dozen times now is
2.6.11-gentoo-r5 but still packets are marked by
iptables but not shaped by tc. It only works when I
mark packets on source/destination ip
As soon as I comment last two lines and uncomment the
first one shaping is g
How to check version of HTB??
I have standart one which came with kernel 2.6.11.7, my tc says I have "TC HTB version 3.3". Is this my HTB version? :-)
Im not using FC3 kernel but a vanilla one so there is no much beta in
it :) besides I cut most of the stuff out just for experimentation and
still
Daniel Dafoe wrote:
Reading along the Net it seems that MAC marking is not
working with egress HTB (because ipables marks
packages based on --mac-source ). So my only choice is
using ingress or u32.
So this is how I did it:
I called bellow script add_shaping
DEV="eth0"
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root ha
If 554 is not the right reply for such a message, what would be a better
way to indicate that the message is concidered utacceptable by my
server?
If it is the best reply, what should I do to avoid being kicked off the
list because my mail server doesn't say "that's fine with me" when it
gets sent
Krystian Antoni wrote:
>
> How to check version of HTB??
> I have standart one which came with kernel 2.6.11.7, my tc says I have
> "TC HTB version 3.3". Is this my HTB version? :-)
No, it isn't. 3.3 is the TC version.
The only ways I know to find out the HTB version are:
1) if it loads as a mo
Reading along the Net it seems that MAC marking is not
working with egress HTB (because ipables marks
packages based on --mac-source ). So my only choice is
using ingress or u32.
So this is how I did it:
I called bellow script add_shaping
DEV="eth0"
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb defau
The problem started with arrival of 2.6 kernels.On 4/22/05, Kunszt Arpad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> Hi all Hi!>> iam also facing the same problem what Mr Antoni have
> even i have done many kind of experment, but i could not resolve is> this bug in FC3,> but when i does the FC1 its working fine>
On Friday 22 of April 2005 01:34, you wrote:
> Which is about 2 packets @ 256kbit. I tested and got the same behaviour
> with a simple setup, but max ping about 45 because htb dequeues in pairs
> by default. If you change #define hysteresis from 1 to 0 in
> net/sched/sch_htb.c then it's more acc
Hi!
Sorry if my question results offtopic in this list: where I can find
more details about flow-control technology? My ProCurve 2848 support
it, and I'm interested if I can use flow-ctl for increase my network
performance.
Thank you for any help.
fRANz
that I apply it IP to each of my network?
Yes, you will want a similar rule for each IP on your network.
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 15kbps
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev imq0 protocol ip parent 10:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src
192.
15 Kbps half duplex
tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 2
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 15kbps
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev imq0 protocol ip parent 10:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src
192.168.1.1/32 flowid 1:1
tc filter a
Daniel Dafoe wrote:
>
> I really don't get it :
>
> Recompiled my kernel dozen times now is
> 2.6.11-gentoo-r5 but still packets are marked by
> iptables but not shaped by tc. It only works when I
> mark packets on source/destination ip
>
> As soon as I comment last two lines and uncomment the
>
> hareram wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> iam also facing the same problem what Mr Antoni have
> even i have done many kind of experment, but i could not resolve is
> this bug in FC3,
> but when i does the FC1 its working fine
>
> I found difference from FC1 to FC3 is
>
> FC1 iptables 1.2.8 HTB 3.12
> FC
> Hi all
Hi!
>
> iam also facing the same problem what Mr Antoni have
> even i have done many kind of experment, but i could not resolve is
> this bug in FC3,
> but when i does the FC1 its working fine
>
> I found difference from FC1 to FC3 is
>
> FC1 iptables 1.2.8 HTB 3.12
> FC3 iptable
I really don't get it :
Recompiled my kernel dozen times now is
2.6.11-gentoo-r5 but still packets are marked by
iptables but not shaped by tc. It only works when I
mark packets on source/destination ip
As soon as I comment last two lines and uncomment the
first one shaping is gone
iptable
Ok, I have another question for you:
10) Is the 15 kbps rate limit a combination of inbound and outbound traffic or
15 kbps for inbound and 15 kbps for outbound for a total of 30 kbps traffic for
any given client. (Is the 15 kbps full duplex or half duplex?)
Grant. . . .
__
Thanks again for your response
tc -s qdisc ls dev eth0
qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 20 direct_packets_stat 0
Sent 12664555 bytes 9717 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits
374)
qdisc sfq 150: parent 1:15 limit 128p quantum 1514b
perturb 10sec
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
qdisc sfq 200: par
20 matches
Mail list logo
