On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 08:00:30AM +0200, Hamish Whittal wrote:
Hi all,
I have the following configuration:
___
++/
diginet link |
Hi All,
I've been playing with QOS for a short while now and have worked out how to do
what I want using HTB. Great queuing discipline btw.
My problem is the tc filters I want to setup aren't working because
iptables is getting to the packets first and mangling the src address.
The iptables
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:51:28AM +0100, KartheeK wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I have configured a Linux box that does traffic shaping. Its working
wonderfully fine, just as expected...Now i want to measure the bandwidth
consumed by each of my hostsBut I dont want SNMP to run on all the
On Jeu 12 mai 2005 8:14, Lee Sanders a écrit :
Hi All,
I've been playing with QOS for a short while now and have worked out how
to do
what I want using HTB. Great queuing discipline btw.
My problem is the tc filters I want to setup aren't working because
iptables is getting to the packets
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:40:56AM +0200, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
On Jeu 12 mai 2005 8:14, Lee Sanders a ?crit :
Hi All,
I've been playing with QOS for a short while now and have worked out how
to do
what I want using HTB. Great queuing discipline btw.
My problem is the tc filters I
On Jeu 12 mai 2005 10:31, Alexander Samad a écrit :
Sylvain
Q) why use do your matching in tc filter and not netfilter ? Is one way
better than the other.
I started out doing it via filter and then moved to netfilter instead
using mark.
Curious to hear what other people have/do do
Alex
Hi Sylvain,
Thanks for that, exactly what I'm doing :)
Along my travels I ran into this: http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
Have you played with L7 and can you rate it good/bad ?
The script you sent didn't answer one question, how to match on IP so I can
add a further level of htb to equally
On Jeu 12 mai 2005 10:52, Lee Sanders a écrit :
Hi Sylvain,
Thanks for that, exactly what I'm doing :)
Ok I thought you were trying to match src addresses, and that would be a
problem because of masquerading ;)
Along my travels I ran into this: http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
Have you
steph,
thanks for _all_ your help. your _time_, your _knowledge_ over the
years.
hip hip hooray
cheers
charles
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 14:19 +0200, Stef Coene wrote:
Hi,
I'm subscribed to this mailing list for a long time. During that time, I
enjoyed reading all posts and try to
On 5/12/05, Dmytro O. Redchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:51:28AM +0100, KartheeK wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I have configured a Linux box that does traffic shaping. Its working
wonderfully fine, just as expected...Now i want to measure the bandwidth
consumed by
Stef
If only you knew how much your impressions help me, and I'm sure a
lot of others, to get to grips with the principles LARTC and to
eventually create our own successful shaping endevours.
Best of luck for the future!
Thanks and regards,
Kenneth
On 5/11/05, Stef Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok I thought you were trying to match src addresses, and that would be a
problem because of masquerading ;)
yep.
Along my travels I ran into this: http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
Have you played with L7 and can you rate it good/bad ?
I've installed it and used it for 2 month, though I
On Jeu 12 mai 2005 12:42, Lee Sanders a écrit :
Interesting because in the L7 FAQ it says they take advantage of
netfilters
connection tracking capabilities to classify connections based on their
first
few packets and then classify packets based on what connection they are
in.
To my
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:51:28AM +0100, KartheeK wrote:
Hello Everybody,
hi
Now i want to measure the bandwidth consumed by each of my hosts
Probably also not exactly what you want, but I have a Linux distribution
Route Hat which is optimised for this sort of usage (also traffic control).
Etx1 - First Internet Line - eth0
Ext2 - Second Internet line - eth2
LAN - Local Area Network - eth1
Other traffic - Ext1 ---+---+--- Ext2 ---Web goes Here
eth0 | |eth2
+---+---+
|
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:03:35PM +0300, Stanislav Nedelchev wrote:
The problem is that i can't check e-mails if server name in e-mail client is
mail.mail.org i can check e-mail only if server addrress is 192.168.0.2
You don't do things like this with routing, but with NAT. More specifically,
hello. I soon will have similar problem.
Do you know any vlan hardware switches from middle shelf price which can shape
traffic on one interface between different vlans on it? With borrowing, not
borrowing and priorityzing?
Linux1--34rmbithw_switch--34m--linux2
Pan'ko Alexzender wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 23:39:35 +0100
Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pan'ko Alexzender wrote:
Hi!
By iptables I set marking (-j MARK) just before -j IMQ.
There are only three marks. Exectly all of them are ditected to 1:20
What are the rules.
There was three tables.
Lee Sanders wrote:
Ok I thought you were trying to match src addresses, and that would be a
problem because of masquerading ;)
yep.
So you need to use addresses before nat - just mark them in iptables
postrouting like.
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING --src 192.168.0.2 -j MARK --set-mark 32
Title: HTB and IPv6
Hi,
I'm trying to use HTB for IPv6 packets. In the LARTC archive I found a thread on this issue where a solution was described. The idea is to mark a user-defined chain then use the fwmark for filtering. However my attempt wasn't successful. I'm thinking of trying my
Stanislav Nedelchev wrote:
Etx1 - First Internet Line - eth0
Ext2 - Second Internet line - eth2
LAN - Local Area Network - eth1
Other traffic - Ext1 ---+---+--- Ext2 ---Web goes Here
eth0 | |eth2
+---+---+
Hi all
with the help of andy
i could able to resolve the problem
instead of mark, if i use classify with iptables
works great
thanks for the all
hare
- Original Message -
From: Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hareram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Sent: Thursday, May 12,
22 matches
Mail list logo
