Franck LEPRETTE wrote:
I remember that I have 3 interfaces and I wonder my self if it's possible
that there are too many interfaces on the computer; or there are
restrictions with iproutes2 etc...?
No, there are not too many interfaces. I have run 4 all at once. Three
were ethernet (DSL)
Hello folks..
Does any of you know if it is possible to rewrite the ip src in a packet.
I have a problem involving a DMZ with external IP addresses routed
trough a single WAN IP. When the server initiates a connection, it looks
like it comes from the WAN ip instead of it's designated External
Maybe I have missed somthing and you need to do it in POSTROUTING but
how about SNAT.
PS: ip can do stateless nat.
On Tue, 2005-
10-25 at 14:36 +0200, Daniel Frederiksen wrote:
Hello folks..
Does any of you know if it is possible to rewrite the ip src in a packet.
I have a problem involving
Oscar Mechanic wrote:
Maybe I have missed somthing and you need to do it in POSTROUTING but
how about SNAT.
Well currently I do not NAT at all. I have ip_forwarding enabled and
have assigned the first IP from the external block on the inside of the
Gateway/Firewall. On the outside of the
So you want packets leaving the WAN to have address e.f.g.h/26 rather
than a.b.c.d/30
That would mean you ISP has assigned you the two ranges e.f.g.h and
a.b.c.d.
Your gateway cannot be a gateway from this diagram
That must be e.f.g.h/27 GW has
e.f.g.h/27 and
excuse my iptables
-m mac --mac-source 00:20:23:20:20:20
You will do this cause you dont want your 26 to become a 27 and loose 3
addrs.
Alias are no longer called aliases but for convenience
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 14:21 +0100, Oscar Mechanic wrote:
So you want packets leaving the WAN to have
Hi everybody,
I have a network that only uses terminal services.
Look at the diagram.
20 machines running WinXP - LinuxFW-1 - 1Mbit link dedicated
fiber link – LinuxFW-2 – Terminal Server
I’d like to give the maximum priority for bandwidth to
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 14:33 -0200, Thiago Lima - lst wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have a network that only uses terminal services.
Look at the diagram.
20 machines running WinXP - LinuxFW-1 - 1Mbit link dedicated
fiber link – LinuxFW-2 – Terminal Server
-Mensagem original-
De: Joost Kraaijeveld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 25 de outubro de 2005 16:41
Para: Thiago Lima - lst
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Assunto: Re: [LARTC] Terminal Services and traffic control.
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 14:33 -0200, Thiago Lima - lst
Oscar Mechanic wrote:
So you want packets leaving the WAN to have address e.f.g.h/26 rather
than a.b.c.d/30
That would mean you ISP has assigned you the two ranges e.f.g.h and
a.b.c.d.
Well, yes my ISP has assigned me the two classes, however the
a.b.c.d/30 is a single IP through which the
Hi.
I am having shaping traffic using tc, I have been trying for a very long
time, and I just didn't get it to work the way I want it.
I will really appriciate it if you experts will have a look at my script
and tell me what I do wrong.
First, I`ll describe my envornment, than my requirements.
had a problem with previous script (debug exit early in it), please look
at this one instead.
while writing the previous message I found and fixed some problem in the
script.
because of this 'exit' I didn't really test the changnes.
it seems that now unclassified packagets no longer grabs
Hi
Can any one point me to any doco on the multipath patches that have been
added to the 2.6.13+
There now seems to be modules multipath_cached multipath_random
multipath_rr etc
Thanks
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
LARTC mailing
On Tuesday 2005-October-25 17:03, Daniel Frederiksen wrote:
Well, yes my ISP has assigned me the two classes, however the
a.b.c.d/30 is a single IP through which the e.f.g.h/26 are routed
through. The ISP is not routing the e.f.g.h/26 directly to the line,
but through the single WAN IP
14 matches
Mail list logo
