Mark Lidstone wrote:
Hi Andy,
Many thanks for the reply.
Is there a reason why the user is not supposed to use pfifo_fast? I
don't think I need a full-on PRIO (surely pfifo_fast is more efficient
if it is classless?). Sorry for asking, but I didn't come across this
limitation in the documenta
What's going on here? I'm spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is
exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this?
class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit
ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b level 0
Sent 16591370 byte
I have the similar line below but it doesn't help, :(
ip route add 1.2.3.0/24 dev eth3 src 1.2.3.4 table 2
ip route add default via 1.2.3.3 table 2
ip rule add from 1.2.3.4 table 2
ip route add 5.6.7.0/24 dev eth4 src 5.6.7.8 table 3
ip route add default via 5.6.7.7 table 3
ip rule add from 5.6.
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:32:08 +0200, bend chen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,lartc!
>
> I read some article for linux qos,who can tell me htb
and hfsc,which
> better?
> I'm not find about hfsc information.
>
> thanks your help.
>
>
>
>
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ htb home
http://
Hi,lartc！
I read some article for linux qos,who can tell me htb and hfsc,which
better?
I'm not find about hfsc information.
thanks your help.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
I had similiar problems, re-reading the docs seemed to solved my
problem, when u create your routing tables, u must make sure, the packet
is returning on the same interface, cause what I found happens, that
after the caching expired, all my downloads use to break, including msn
this is an exam
Hi Everyone,
This is a simple question but I don't understand why the below tbf is not
working as expected by throttling traffic to 5kbps
If I throttle a PC's traffic using the below when traffic exceeds 5kbps
packets start getting dropped (as they should) but all traffic gets dropped.
not jus
