Hi,
I have the shown (end of this post) net work configuration.
In a "few" words: My Debian Sarge server is connected to a D-Link ADSL
Router (DSL-562T). DMZ is enabled for the Debian Sarge IP on the Router.
My Linux server has two NIC's.
ethlan = internal Net
ethdsl = external -> D-Link
My Lin
Hi,
I'm trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a
ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up)
Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate
limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router
or the ISP.
The Idea is then
Hello,
I need to understand how conntrack_core.c handles the termination
of 'expected' connection; handling in the case when 'expected'
connection arrived, then terminates (In my conntrack module,
I need to specially handle the event of termination termination
of 'expected' connection.)
In ip_
hi
i recently searched in the mailinglist archive and found similar
problems, whose solutions helped very much, thank you.
i have the following scenario:
a firewall with one lan interface
eth0 10.1.1.1/24
and two uplink interfaces
eth1 10.2.2.1/24
eth2 10.3.3.1/24
each uplink interface does SNA
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 05:44:17PM +0200, Cristian Carstea wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:15:02PM +0200, Cristian Carstea wrote:
> >> hello,
> >>
> >> i have a question:
> >> - which one is faster: "tc filter with u32 match per dst ip" or
> "iptables match per dst ip with target CLASSIFY"
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:15:02PM +0200, Cristian Carstea wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> i have a question:
>> - which one is faster: "tc filter with u32 match per dst ip" or
"iptables match per dst ip with target CLASSIFY"?
>> - this question is for large rulesets (over 500)
>
> use hashes if it's pos
Hi All,
Please for some advice.
I have Linux router that do traffic control with HTB , routing and traffic
counting.
currently machine is with P4 2.2GHZ 1GB RAM. I plan to migrate to dual core
CPU. I know well
P4 dual core but is it anybody has experience with AMD64 dual core / or
single core /
Hi,
foxy 202 schrieb:
>
> I have Linux router that do traffic control with HTB , routing and traffic
> counting.
> currently machine is with P4 2.2GHZ 1GB RAM. I plan to migrate to dual core
> CPU. I know well
> P4 dual core but is it anybody has experience with AMD64 dual core / or
> single core
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:35:36PM +0200, Anton Glinkov wrote:
> Is the prio specification in the htb class global or is it on a per class
> basis? A simple example:
>
> class 1:10 parent 1:
> class 1:130 parent 1:10 prio 3
>
> class 1:170 parent 1:10 prio 7
> class 1:171 parent 1:170 prio 1
> cl
In general the dual core Opterons tend to be a lot faster than the P4
dual cores. But its possible that this has changed since I last saw a
performance comparison of the two.
-Paul
On 1/30/06, foxy 202 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Please for some advice.
>
> I have Linux router
Hi All,
Please for some advice.
I have Linux router that do traffic
control with HTB , routing and traffic counting.currently machine is with P4 2.2GHZ 1GB
RAM. I plan to migrate to dual core CPU. I know wellP4 dual core but is it anybody has
experience with AMD64 dual
On 1/30/06, Peter Surda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
> > Guys
> Hi,
Hi Peter
> > First the case study. An untrusted network with over-subscribed users
> > (and abusers). Common at universities and bigger enterprises. People
> > want good speed at any time, but abusers should
Hello
Is the prio specification in the htb class global or is it on a per class
basis? A simple example:
class 1:10 parent 1:
class 1:130 parent 1:10 prio 3
class 1:170 parent 1:10 prio 7
class 1:171 parent 1:170 prio 1
class 1:172 parent 1:170 prio 2
Which class will get excessive bandwidth fi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:15:02PM +0200, Cristian Carstea wrote:
> hello,
>
> i have a question:
> - which one is faster: "tc filter with u32 match per dst ip" or "iptables
> match per dst ip with target CLASSIFY"?
> - this question is for large rulesets (over 500)
use hashes if it's possible to
Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
Guys
Hi,
First the case study. An untrusted network with over-subscribed users
(and abusers). Common at universities and bigger enterprises. People
want good speed at any time, but abusers should be detected and
clamped down automatically. This system needs intelligence.
hello,
i have a question:
- which one is faster: "tc filter with u32 match per dst ip" or "iptables
match per dst ip with target CLASSIFY"?
- this question is for large rulesets (over 500)
thank you,
cristian carstea
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman
Laurent Haond a écrit :
>Hi, all
>
>I've got problems with tc qdisc ingress.
>I'm using vanillia kernel 2.6.14.4 patched with
>http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.6.14-12.diff, and iproute2-2.6.14-051107.
>
>i am using ingress to limit incoming traffic :
>(DEV is eth1 / DOWNLINK is 7700)
>
># attach i
Guys
Reading through my lartc mail, and thinking on how to tackle my next
shaping solution, gave me an idea. I'd like to propose this idea for
scrutiny and if it sounds viable I'll definitely need to start
developing in due time.
For me in my day to day work with developing network application
sp
18 matches
Mail list logo
