Jody Shumaker wrote:
On 3/3/06, nix4me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am currently running the following script on an internal machine to
shape outbound ftp and email traffic.
I am trying to move the script to my nat router (ipcop with 2 nic cards)
so that it shapes the whole network and not
I am currently running the following script on an internal machine to
shape outbound ftp and email traffic.
I am trying to move the script to my nat router (ipcop with 2 nic cards)
so that it shapes the whole network and not only the outbound of 1 box.
I have cable modem -> ipcop (eth1) >(eth
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:45:31PM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
> Andreas Hasenack said:
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:18:00AM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
> >> On Friday 03 March 2006 08:43, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
> >> > > Any chan
Andreas Hasenack said:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:18:00AM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
>> On Friday 03 March 2006 08:43, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
>> > > Any chance something like this can be applied to q_tbf? It's been
classful for
Hi,
I am trying to set up a uPnP server on a Linux box (Debian Sarge Stable kernel
2.6.8). uPnP
works using multicast packages for locating servers.
This does however seem to fail unless I set the relevant NIC in promiscuous
mode. If I do so,
it works well.
I have added
ip route add 224.0.0
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:18:00AM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
> On Friday 03 March 2006 08:43, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
> > > Any chance something like this can be applied to q_tbf? It's been
> > > classful for a while and I find a t
On Friday 03 March 2006 08:43, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
> > Any chance something like this can be applied to q_tbf? It's been
> > classful for a while and I find a tbf with a prio under it works quite
> > well for my
>
> tbf qdisc is c
Hi list!
I did this:
2: root qdisc prio
2:1 counter-strike
2:2 --> 1: htb qdisc for other traffic.
2:3 unused
The shaping ocurrs both on the external and the internal interfaces.
ping is in this case 500 - 1200 ms.
without shapeing it is between 150 and 200 ms.
:(
Any ideas?
Would ingress qdisc h
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
> Any chance something like this can be applied to q_tbf? It's been classful
> for a while and I find a tbf with a prio under it works quite well for my
tbf qdisc is classfull?
___
LARTC m
