William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
From memory the reasoning for not including had nothing to do with
issues like that. I believe it was more of a demand vs benefit thing. If
everything everyone wanted or used went into the kernel it would be
huge, slow, and etc.
So unless there is a very large
On 3/20/06, Peter Surda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gypsy wrote: Even with huge, and 8 gigs of RAM is huge, amounts of RAM, you need a dedicated swap partition.Don't believe those who say you don't.On the contrary. I run many systems without any swap at all.
What you get by using swap is (from a very
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Thanks to all, but to be more particular, Im going to use the machine with 8
or
12 Gig of physical memory for squid caching, and we all know that caching
consumes to much memory. Our objective actually is to cache the most popular
pages on the memory so that it will
On 3/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all, but to be more particular, Im going to use the machine with 8 or
12 Gig of physical memory for squid caching, and we all know that cachingconsumes to much memory. Our objective actually is to cache the most popularpages on the
On 3/21/06, Jason Boxman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:As you've discovered, with 12GB of RAM using a 2 or 3 multiply rule ishardly reasonable.
Sorry?
That's a 36 GB swap ( 12 x 3 )?
So much memory at all.
Ideally you will pick a value based on testing your workload against
I'm admin of 50 clients. I have a 800/640kbit internet connection.
Could you help me a shaper witch would load websites very fast.
I know that i need to use burst, but thats all :(
i'm using www.eranetas.com/gg/DAY shaper.
I don't understand the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# tc -s class ls dev vlan1 tc -s qdisc ls dev vlan1
class hfsc 1: root
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
period 0 level 2
class hfsc 1:1 parent 1: sc m1 0bit d 0us m2 22bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2
22bit
Sent 0 bytes 0
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:24:41 -0500 (EST)
James Lentini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ip(8) command has a bug when dealing with IPoIB link layer
addresses. Specifically it does not correctly handle the addition of
new entries in the neighbor/arp table. For example, this command will
fail:
James Nelson wrote:
I don't understand the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# tc -s class ls dev vlan1 tc -s qdisc ls dev vlan1
class hfsc 1: root
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
period 0 level 2
class hfsc 1:1 parent 1: sc m1 0bit d 0us m2 22bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2
