Hi,
I have a P4 @ 3Ghz router running Debian. It shapes
traffic ( about 500-600 classes ), about 1000 iptables rules, and it
does BGP too, so i get about
1300+ routes in the routing table. The problem is the load is too high
on this system. I found a solution to my problem, turning off the route
Hi I am pretty much a newbie, I found with sip if I match ports 5060 and
1 - 2 it works I noticed on some phones the use 13000 - 14000 and
others use 18000 - 19000. there is a new sip-contrack out although I
haven't tried it yet.
william
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
mmm... intresting
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_iptables
ip_conntrack_sip
Someone has tried it ?
works on 2.4 kernel series ?
thanks
-
-
- Hi I am pretty much a newbie, I found with sip if I match ports 5060 and
- 1 - 2 it works I noticed on some
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
One more thing I just thought - sfq sets its quantum from the dev mtu.
Riiight. I should have tried without the sfq earlier. Without it this
works as expected without explicit mtu setting for the htb class. And no
giants.
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
# tc
Andy Furniss wrote:
Looking again at your stats -
Sent 189796883 bytes 20626 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 3484Kbit 45pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
lended: 20627 borrowed: 0 giants: 30926
tokens: -9768 ctokens: -9768
The giants count is higher than the packet count so now I
Andy Furniss wrote:
Andy Furniss wrote:
Looking again at your stats -
Sent 189796883 bytes 20626 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 3484Kbit 45pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
lended: 20627 borrowed: 0 giants: 30926
tokens: -9768 ctokens: -9768
The giants count is higher than the
Mensaje citado por: LinuXKiD [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mmm... intresting
:) indeed..
Someone has tried it ?
I suppose, i have received very goog feedback about it.
works on 2.4 kernel series ?
Only 2.6.11. (rusty newnat api)
BTW, using the \helper\ extension in IPTABLES is possible to
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:30:18AM +0300, Andrei Sandu wrote:
I have a P4 @ 3Ghz router running Debian. It shapes traffic ( about
500-600 classes ), about 1000 iptables rules, and it does BGP too, so i get
about
1300+ routes in the routing table. The problem is the load is too high on
Hi,
can anybody comment on the cost of matching with IPP2P vs. Layer7.
Also, does a iptables rule with more complicated matching mechanism also
slow down processing if all the packets are matched before they reach
the rule. I.e. is the mere existence of a potentially costly rule
already
