Re: [LARTC] icmp latency question

2006-05-02 Thread Sebastian Bork
the sew wrote: Our company's main line is quite busy the whole day and my shaping is working perfect, however even if I give icmp priority the pings still jump around quite a bit. We do have a backup line which hardly get used only if the main line drops. I've set ip rule to route all icmp

[LARTC] Re: icmp latency question

2006-05-02 Thread the sew
Glad I could have been some entertainment, Thanks for clearing that up. Sorry about the stupid question, at least I know now Sew On 4/30/06, Sebastian Bork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the sew wrote: Our company's main line is quite busy the whole day and my shaping is working perfect, however

Re: [LARTC] icmp latency question

2006-05-02 Thread Andrew Beverley
Our company's main line is quite busy the whole day and my shaping is working perfect, however even if I give icmp priority the pings still jump around quite a bit. Sorry, I don't want to offend you, but your mail has been the cause for the first good laugh of the day. It may have been a

Re: [LARTC] icmp latency question

2006-05-02 Thread Jason Boxman
Andrew Beverley wrote: snip For SSH I have: tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbit ceil 800kbit prio 1 tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10 tc filter add dev imq0 parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle 10 fw flowid 1:10 sfq's default queue of 128