G Georgiev wrote:
Hi,
Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with
racoon/setkey
on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT router for all
traffic from my network to a network segment on the far side.
my network --- my gateway
Hello all,
I am trying to make a little bit more complex QoS/Shapping form and
I need to shape a PPPoE conection that I serve to my clients. So this is
the scope:
client connects using pppoe so it gets an IP address (from pppoe pool)
and open an interface into my linux box
interface
Hi,
I need help finding this patch that Stephen made.
He sent me a patch, but i do not think its related to the patch that
solved this problem. I will include the patch he did forward to me at
the bottom.
However here is the problem, i even rtied his misspelling of change :)
thorium-ini
Thanks,
Will try out that - will upgrade the kernel and see how it works.
George.
On Friday 05 May 2006 09:39 am, Patrick McHardy wrote:
G Georgiev wrote:
Hi,
Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with
racoon/setkey on which I have
On Fri, 05 May 2006 11:08:23 -0400
George Nychis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need help finding this patch that Stephen made.
He sent me a patch, but i do not think its related to the patch that
solved this problem. I will include the patch he did forward to me at
the bottom.
Hi I am having problems trying to get a time match with iptables 1.3.5 and
the latest pom it says time match only works in the prerouting stage but I
really need to use the classify command which only works in the postrouting.
Does any one have a patch for 2.6 kernel, latest pom and iptables
Could someone comment on the benefits of using CLASSIFY vs fwmark (or
vice versa) in iptables?
I'm getting ready to implement some basic tc for VoIP and most of the
examples seem to use the (older?) fwmark syntax. Should I convert these
to CLASSIFY? Can the two syntaxes be mixed? Also with
