Hi, all
I am interested in Linux related QoS, especially PRIO queue discipline (qdisc).
I test some experiments about PRIO qdisc.
Host A -- Router A --- Router B --- Host C
| 1Gbps |
Host B -+ + Host D
flow 1 : Host A -> Host C (TCP)
flo
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 11:49 +0200, Martin Devera wrote:
> At time of HTB implementation I needed to reach 100MBit speed on
> relatively slow box. The hysteresis was a way. On other side I used
> hand-made TSC based measure tool to compute exact (15%) performance
> gain. Today I'd measure it usin
On Monday 19 June 2006 10:55 pm, Luciano Ruete wrote:
> El Monday 19 June 2006 23:24, Frank Abel Cancio Bello escribió:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > On http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.adv-filter.html I read that a classifiers
> > available bases the decision on how the firewall has marked the packet
> > and on
On Di, 2006-06-20 at 19:50 +0200, Stefano Mainardi wrote:
> I need to work with TC on a virtual interface. Is it possible ?
I guess you mean the "eth0:1" and alike that ifconfig generates.
If so, no, it is not possible (at least directly), since those are
just additional addresses bound to an exis
Hello list, i thank you for the precious info you gave me, they were really useful in my work. I
need to work with TC on a virtual interface. Is it possible ? How ?
There is any doc on this topic ? And foremost, is my idea of working
with TC on a virtual interface viable ?
I am wondering if to cont
jamal wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-20-06 at 03:04 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>It would be nice to have support for HFSC as well, which unfortunately
>>needs to be done in the kernel since it doesn't use rate tables.
>>What about qdiscs like SFQ (which uses the packet size in quantum
>>calculations)
jamal wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-20-06 at 02:54 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>jamal wrote:
>>
>>>- For further reflection: Have you considered the case where the rate
>>>table has already been considered on some link speed in user space and
>>>then somewhere post-config the physical link speed chan
Hello,
I'm trying to use iptables rules to prioritize p2p
trafic. I use ipp2p-0.8 but it give me errors :
Ipt-ipp2p : unknow symbol ntohl
Ipt-ipp2p : unknow symbol ntohs
When i compiled ipp2p it gave me warnings :
"ntohs"
/ipt-ipp2p.ko undefined
"ntohl"
/ipt-ipp2p.ko undefined
Any suggestion
