On 25/06/2006 12:13 AM, jamal wrote:
You can actually stop reading here if you have gathered the view at
this point that i am not objecting to the simple approach Patrick is
going with...
Perhaps this is my problem. I am not sure I understand
what Patrick is proposing. I can wait for his patc
Hi all.
I need a sanity check. I'm trying to setup my network to handle VoIP. I'm
thinking that all I need to do is prioritize the realtime traffic above the
interactive and bulk traffic. I see so much discussion about traffic
shapping, but I don't THINK this is needed, right? I understand
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 17:21 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Not really. The randomization doesn't happen by default, but it doesn't
> influence this anyway. SFQ allows flows to send up to "quantum" bytes
> at a time before moving on to the next one. A flow that sends 75 * 20
> byte will in the eye
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_DRR=y
and all of this algorithms works perfectly over icmp , but there is some
(maybe) problems with tcp
Torsten Luettgert wrote:
On Fr, 2006-06-23 at 14:36 -0700, Alaios wrote:
rtfm means?
"[Please] read the fine manuals."
Ok, some people don't say "fine".
Or please.
Regards,
Torsten
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://m
Martin A. Brown wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings all,
Working in concert with the original authors, Klaus Rechert and
Patrick McHardy, I have translated their article "HFSC Scheduling
mit Linux" [0] on Hierarchical Fair Service Curve (HFSC) into
English [1].
now i'm read a lot of knowledge paper about traffic control in linux because now i'm try to develop and research about traffic shaper so can everybody tell me about my topic
... Is it can do for real
my topic is "now, many organization use traffic shaper for control traffic and bandwidth becau
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 20:04:53 -0300
Luciano Ruete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Equalize was available as a patch in 2.4 kernels and AFAIK there are not 2.6
> patches, so to set that flag do nothing in most cases.
>
its quite strange , its somesort of working under 2.6.16 ,
> I think you hav
Thanks luciano,
without CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED works like a charm.
Luciano Ruete wrote:
> El Sunday 18 June 2006 05:12, Vladimir Vitkov escribió:
>> yes it is set.
>> Also both round robin and weighted modes
>
> Ok, then may you hit the problem, give a tray to a kernel without
> CONFI
On Fr, 2006-06-23 at 14:36 -0700, Alaios wrote:
> rtfm means?
"[Please] read the fine manuals."
Ok, some people don't say "fine".
Regards,
Torsten
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
10 matches
Mail list logo
