Re: [LARTC] Why does scp stall on low bandwidth connections?

Hello Andy, Thanks for the explanation one more time;-) Cheers, -Nikolay Andy Furniss wrote: Nikolay Kichukov wrote: Hello Andy, unshaped here means with higher priority than the rest of the classes that have filters attached to them? Yes it will just be passed and not be accounted for by

[LARTC] HTB and ATM patch

Hi all, I patch my kernel (2.6.17) and my tc (iproute2-2.6.18-061002) utilitie for an accurate packet scheduling on an ATM link. I configure my HTB hierarchy on the upload of the link and try with differents flows. It works correctly but in some of case I lose about 50% of my bandwith. I use

Re: [LARTC] Using Julian Anastasov's 'routes' patches on 2.4 kernel in conjunction with IPSec

On Tuesday 26 June 2007 00:40, Julian Anastasov wrote: May be you have to replace your _updown script with one that supports ip route and ip rule commands instead of the old route tool. By this way you can use ip rule ... from LNET to RNET to properly route traffic for the negotiated

[LARTC] pfifo_fast priomap

Hi list, I have a quick question about the priority mapping of tos bits. The manpage of tc-prio shows a nice table with tos bits and the band they are mapped to: TOS Bits MeansLinux PriorityBand 0x0

Re: [LARTC] pfifo_fast priomap

On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:35 +0200, Roel van Meer wrote: Hi list, I have a quick question about the priority mapping of tos bits. The manpage of tc-prio shows a nice table with tos bits and the band they are mapped to: TOS Bits MeansLinux PriorityBand