Hi!
I am studying HTB. I used the topology showed below:
10.1.0.1 -- 10.1.14.25 (eth1) / 192.168.10.10 (eth0) - 192.168.10.11
(host 1) (router)
(host 2)
All machines use Debian Etch. Has a Iptables masquerading rule to eth1
in the router machine . The NICs are
Hi,
I have a testing multihome setup, with the default gateway being one of
the links and using policy routing to honor requests for a specific
link. Everything works as expected when I request a specific IP to bind
to. But if I request a specific interface things fall apart in ways that
I ca
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:38:04 +0300
Anton Glinkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why don't you just use bridging with spanning tree?
> Will achieve exactly the thing you need.
>
> 1. Create br0 on both machines
> 2. Turn on spanning tree on br0
> 3. Choose one of them to be root
> 4. Assign tap0 and
Hello,
Why don't you just use bridging with spanning tree?
Will achieve exactly the thing you need.
1. Create br0 on both machines
2. Turn on spanning tree on br0
3. Choose one of them to be root
4. Assign tap0 and tap1 to br0 (tap0 having lower path cost)
that's it.
Or just check if there is s
I will be out of the office starting 06/08/2007 and will not return until
28/08/2007.
I will answer your inquiry after my return to the office. In urgent cases,
please do contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (T: +43/1/515 54 - 332) or Tan
Van Nguyen (T: +43/1/515 54 -267). With kind regards, Michael Gilly.
Hello list,
Please don't shoot me. I know I'm doing something with bonding that
bonding wasn't made for. I just want to give it a try. I want a simple
mechanism to have a failover on a 24Mbit line to a 2Mbit line in case
the 24Mbit line goes down.
Between A and B there are two lines: a 24Mbit and
Sarò assente dall'ufficio a partire dal 13/08/2007 e non tornerò fino al
27/08/2007.
Risponderò al messaggio al mio ritorno.
Trend Scan Mail:
this message is virus free.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mail
Thank you for this very complete answer.
- Assuming I really have to implement some sort of inactive slave-link
check.
- Assuming it is acceptable to remove the inactive slave from the bound
for the duration of the check.
Could you help me check my script? It works well for me but as I'm abou