Re: [LARTC] two providers.

2007-08-16 Thread Indunil Jayasooriya
On 8/16/07, Виталий Цховребов <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, people. > > I read iptables tutorial and lartc, but i'm still confused with one > trouble. > > May be this question was discussed already, so forward me solution, if > is. > > So, there's a trouble. > > I have debian etch linux. 2.

RE: [LARTC] Unable to match/classify non-icmp traffic with TOSbiggerthan 0x10

2007-08-16 Thread Salim S I
Did you try to capture the packets with tcpdump or something and check the TOS field? Was it correct? I had a similar set up before, though not bridge, and it worked. -Original Message- From: Salim S I [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 10:59 AM To: 'Salim S I'; 'Ming

RE: [LARTC] Unable to match/classify non-icmp traffic with TOSbiggerthan 0x10

2007-08-16 Thread Salim S I
Sorry, I hadn't seen 0x68 match. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salim S I Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 10:47 AM To: 'Ming-Ching Tiew'; lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: RE: [LARTC] Unable to match/classify non-icmp traffic with TOSbiggerthan

RE: [LARTC] Unable to match/classify non-icmp traffic with TOS biggerthan 0x10

2007-08-16 Thread Salim S I
Is it because the TOS and DSCP values are different? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ming-Ching Tiew Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 5:21 PM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] Unable to match/classify non-icmp traffic with TOS bigge

[LARTC] HTB tree is too deep

2007-08-16 Thread Marco C. Coelho
I've got a linux (2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.centos.plus) router doing pppoe termination and HTB rate limiting. the number of connections has grown quite a bit in the last few months, and I'm now getting a: HTB tree is too deep message on the monitor. where is the setting for max depth? _

Re: [LARTC] two providers.

2007-08-16 Thread goblin
> So, there's a trouble. > > I have debian etch linux. 2.6.18-4 kernel. > > On this computer i have three interfaces: eth0 - my lan, eth1, eth2 - > providers. > > By default all internet traffic routed through eth2. But i NEED to > route mail and icq (tcp110, tcp25, tcp5190) through eth1. How c

[LARTC] How to see the sfq hash table ?

2007-08-16 Thread David Boreham
I'm grappling with a problem that looks like sfq is not working (packets don't get fairly queued, they appear to be always sent FIFO). My configuration appears to be correct. The machine is running quite an old kernel and if I could convince myself that the sfq code it has is just broken, I'd spen

[LARTC] two providers.

2007-08-16 Thread Виталий Цховребов
Hello, people. I read iptables tutorial and lartc, but i'm still confused with one trouble. May be this question was discussed already, so forward me solution, if is. So, there's a trouble. I have debian etch linux. 2.6.18-4 kernel. On this computer i have three interfaces: eth0 - my lan, eth1

[LARTC] Unable to match/classify non-icmp traffic with TOS bigger than 0x10

2007-08-16 Thread Ming-Ching Tiew
This problem is driving nuts, so I am seeking help here. Your help will be deeply appreciated. I have made myself a Linux bridge with eth1 and eth0 to form br0. Then I run a script to configure tc with htb on it. But I can never match non-icmp traffic ( such as tcp and udp ) with TOS or DSCP val