(Before any one questions why I withheld information and went down the
road that I did, I'd like to say that I had fully intended to respond
with more detail, however other things going on both at work and home
prevented me from doing so before now. I also sort of paused because of
the discuss
On 8/29/2007 8:50 PM, Rangi Biddle wrote:
Firstly I can appreciate where Grant is coming from. There are a
number of things that aren't so commonly done with Linux that the
community currently doesn't provide answers for and obviously there
are people out there that know how to do things that
Hi Guys,
Well here's my two cents worth regarding this whole thing.
Firstly I can appreciate where Grant is coming from. There are a number of
things that aren't so commonly done with Linux that the community currently
doesn't provide answers for and obviously there are people out there that
kno
I am interested in the incoming traffic (from Internet to lan users). This is
the problem.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:12:09 +0200, Javier Ors wrote
>
>
> As far as I undestand, at least sfq should work without knowing the actual
> bandwith (you don't need to specify it in the qdisc creation). The
I thought the same thing a year ago. You set an htb class bigger than Vmax in
the output ethernet, the you can attach esfq or WRR (sfq only works with
conecctions and I need to work with destination ip addresses). But it never
works.
Now I understand that if you set the class bigger than V
>
> There is some queue disciplines like esfq and WRR (w. But theses ones only
> work if you know the actual bandwidth.
As far as I undestand, at least sfq should work without knowing the actual
bandwith (you don't need to specify it in the qdisc creation). The problem
with it is that it only wor
I have this problem:
I have an Internet line input with variable speed. I have a max speed and a
min speed: Vmax and Vmin.
The speed is always changing between Vmax and Vmin. I want to share the
actual bandwidth (you don't not how much, you only know the speed is between
Vmax and Vmin) for N
I have this problem:
I have an Internet line input with variable speed. I have a max speed and a
min speed: Vmax and Vmin.
The speed is always changing between Vmax and Vmin. I want to share the
actual bandwidth (you don't not how much, you only know the speed is between
Vmax and Vmin) for N c
Dear all,
I'm having real problems getting tc to do anything useful at all. I'm
also under pressure to get this fixed before the students start arriving
later this month (I work in a university).
In short, I want each IP address to be hard limited to 128kbit down,
64kbit up, never to be allo
I wonder if somebody has got good results (accurate shaping) using 2.6.22?
I am testing with 2.6.22.1, and I haven't been able to get accurate shaping.
For instance, I tried:
$TC qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 1
$TC class add dev eth0parent 1: classid
Hello Martin,
I used to have this kind of problem before. Not sure if I resolved it
with the help of folks on this mailing list, but I never tested.
What you can try is to remove the prio parameter from the classes and
leave the prio only for the filters.
Let us know if that helps.
Cheers,
-Niko
Yes, exactly. So my 1:20 class (prio 1) should get to send more than the 1:30
class. But
it doesn't, they both get about the same throughput.
Nobody else having problems with the prio parameter?
Martin
bartekR wrote:
> Martin Björnsson pisze:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm experimenting with HTB and the
IMHO, the priomap explanation in the 9.2.1.1. of the LARTC HOWTO is not
clear enough. I only understood it's real behavior until I read this
document from Russell Stuart:
http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/doc/tc/priority.txt So, based
in this information, I've prepared an alternative p
Martin Björnsson pisze:
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me
results I
expect. I've created 4 HTB classes:
1:10 TCP ACKs (prio 0)
1:20 TCP traffic on dst port 10001 (prio 1)
1:30 TCP traffic on dst port 1 (prio 2)
1:40 De
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me
results I
expect. I've created 4 HTB classes:
1:10 TCP ACKs (prio 0)
1:20 TCP traffic on dst port 10001 (prio 1)
1:30 TCP traffic on dst port 1 (prio 2)
1:40 Default
Hi Adam :)
* Adam James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:47:38 +0200
> DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've tested this and having a cpufreq that slows down the CPU
> > affects the rate of HTB. My ondemand cpufreq governor scales down the
> > CPU frequency ab
16 matches
Mail list logo
