Thanks.
one more thing. I am using a iptable command to match dscp value and drop
corresponding packets.
iptables -A INPUT -o eth0 -p udp -m --dscp 0x08 -j DROP
is the syntex of the command correct?
its showing following error: -
iptables v1.2.8: Couldn't load match `--dscp':/lib/iptables/lib
Hi Michal,
Thanks for your much needed suggestion.
Actually i have a video Delivey server(suppose it supports 240 simultaneous
calls).
It takes request from various users for video delivery.
Now suppose if i want that after load reaches to 200, i should only allow
premium users.In order to ide
Hi, everyone.
I'm newbie to TC.
Now, I want to control my gateway traffic with tc.
I have a typical linux gateway server (CentOS 5)
Requirement is as follows:
1. Total bandwidth is 10M (either up or down)
2. Each PC in the subnet (192.168.0.0/24) should be limited to 1M bandwidth,
so that no singl
Raghuvendra Kumar wrote:
Hi all,
> [...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]#tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip u32 match ip dsfield
8 police drop
its showing error "Illegal "match".
Can any one of you guide me , what is the correct way of doing it.
Its imporatnt, Please post reply ASAP.
For instanc
On 16 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Suppose we have simple router with upstream interface connected
> to internet (eth0) and downstream interface connected to lan (eth1).
> Lan uses private addressing so there is NAT rule used for traffic
> leaving eth0.
>
> You can redirect lan->internet t
Hi all,
I am wondering if anyone can help me to resolve a problem.
I am trying to use tc command in linux to drop udp
packets of specific diffserv value.
I am able set diffserv value successfully in the udp packet
using command:-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]#iptables --table mangle --append OUTPUT \
Hello list,
I need to realize a complicated custom shaping setup, and given very
little experience with shaping I just can't wrap my head around it. I am
not seeking a complete script, I just need an idea/a set of pointers on
how to best subdivide traffic accordingly to my needs, and which shaper
>But AFAIK at the moment practically only if there is no NAT involved
>(or if you do not want to classify de-nated traffic).
>Any news regarding this problem?
Suppose we have simple router with upstream interface connected
to internet (eth0) and downstream interface connected to lan (eth1).
Lan u