[LARTC] Help With WRR

Could anyone explain what is WRR param2 [wmode2 , incr2 , decr2 , min2] for ? can i set just the param1 ? [wmode1 , incr1 , decr1,min1] -- []'s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente". ___

[LARTC] Fwd: iptables

Hi All, I am running iptables on centos 4.5 and 5 boxes. Now , I have requirements to enable below features. Gateway level antivirus, anti spyware and intrusion preventions, content filtering, etc. I googled a bit. But, Still no luck to find proper Docs to enable these. Can Iptables meet these

[LARTC] ip neigh show and NUD_NOARP state - is it possible ?

Hello, I know that there are devices which are not working with arp. For example, the loopback device. I was wondering whether it is possible to create neighbours in a NUD_NOARP state; so that "ip neigh show" will show such neighbours where their state is NUD_ARP. I made some tests with the loopba

Re: [LARTC] HTB deadlock

>Greetings, Hi, >I've been experiencing problems with HTB where the whole machine locks >up. This usually happens when the whole qdisc is being removed and >occasionally when a leaf is being removed. You may be interested in reading these two: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9318 http

Re: [LARTC] traffic not getting into class

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > ${TC} filter add dev ${DEV_IFB} parent 1:0 prio 4 protocol ip u32 \ > match ip protocol 0x6 0xff \ match ip dport 21 0x \ classid 1:14 > # ftp-server > > This works fine, but traffic for 1:14 (ftp) never gets into 1:14. > > Is there a cert

Re: [LARTC] traffic not getting into class

> ${TC} filter add dev ${DEV_IFB} parent 1:0 prio 4 protocol ip u32 \ > match ip protocol 0x6 0xff \ > match ip dport 21 0x \ > classid 1:14 # ftp-server > > This works fine, but traffic for 1:14 (ftp) never gets into 1:14. > > Is there a certain rule order in which filters must b

Re: [LARTC] doubt about esfq

Salatiel Filho wrote: > In esfq README i have: > > Depth sets the number of slots. If the number of active flows is greater >than the number of slots, flows will end up sharing slots and ESFQ will no >longer be fair. If you anticipate more than 128 concurrently active flows, >you shoul

RE: [LARTC] traffic not getting into class

Wouldn't it depend on if you are using passive FTP or not? http://www.slacksite.com/other/ftp.html Shane McKinley Habersham EMC -Original Message- From: richard lucassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 6:10 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] traffi