On 05/04/11 17:11, Don Gould wrote:
Sorry, my bad.
No problem. We are all human.
I want to block, drop, what ever, Microsoft networking... wins? but I do
want to permit internet networking (for what of some better terms.
Ok.
So we are only talking about filtering TCP / UDP ports 137,
/If/ this mailing list is to move to a new domain, I'd suggest that we
move it to something at lartc.org if at all possible. Rather than
moving it to a different domain that is not directly associated with
LARTC or portable.
Doing that would keep the mailing list address (hopefully
Hi
I sort of agree. This list just magically came back to life. Why? Did
someone flip a switch? Who is that person? Will they turn it off
again?
Also, regarding the site, its very static. I think a wiki could
replace it and breath some new life into it.
Adrian
2011/5/5 João Almeida
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 00:12 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Grant Taylor,
Am 2011-05-04 14:24:17, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch
Hi,
has anyone contacted vger.kernel.org about lartc list creation?
Andrew Burgess wrote:
On 05/04/2011 07:10:01 PM, Russell Stuart wrote:
A list on vger.kernel.org does seem like a workable solution. Large a
third party provider such as google groups, yahoo groups, github,
sourceforge or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
Are there plans to implement the anycast feature set in ip for IPv6
anycast addresses?
Thanks in advance,
Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
- --
Spider Pig, Spider Pig, Does whatever a Spider Pig does.
Can he swing, from a web, no he can't, he's
