+1
-Original Message-
From: lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl] On
Behalf Of Russell Stuart
Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2011 9:41 AM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] List fault?
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:24 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> All in favo
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:19:22AM +0100, Radek 'Goblin' Pieczonka wrote:
>
>>> Suppose, I have 3 mail servers @ DMZ zone with one real ip. the situation
>>> as before?
>>>
>>> in that case, What can I do?
>>>
>> your could use exim/postfix and route the mail to the right server, but I
>> gu
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:09:52PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > see cache_peer !!
> >
> > squid can load balance between 3 servers and cache it !!
> >
> > run squid on your box with real ip..
> >
> > Thanks for your quick answer. I know about reverse proxy. I wanted to know
> >
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:00:14PM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Peter Rabbitson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unfortunately not easy without doing local NAT (from the local interface
> > to another local interface).
Can you use marking, mark the packet in the mangle table, us iptables t
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:07:10PM +1000, Tim Groeneveld wrote:
> Greeting all,
>
> I have a bit of a complicated question.
>
> I have two ethernet devices, eth1 and eth2.
>
> eth1 is where my internet comes from. It is in the form of
> 202.172.122.208/29.
> It has another IP range, 202.172.12
Hi
Currently I use snmp to scrap information from my router about its interfaces,
does any one have an easy way of scaping information from tc rules to place
into a rrd db ?
do I need to put together a perl script to extract it from the output ?
Alex
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
sound like you need a routing protocol, if you have access to manage all the
routers
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:44:09PM -0600, Tony Hagans wrote:
> Currently I have a setup that involves connections from several different
> providers ranging from 6 mbit DSL's to 10 mbit fractional DS3 connectio
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:48:13PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Alex Samad wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:40:29PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Alex Samad wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:36:18PM -0700, D
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:40:29PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Alex Samad wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:36:18PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'm trying to create a routed VPN using OpenVPN - and having trouble with
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:36:18PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to create a routed VPN using OpenVPN - and having trouble with
> the routing concepts involved. Let me see if I can properly describe my
> current topology:
>
> Server -
> LAN, with both local workstations and
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 03:25:11PM +0500, Arman wrote:
> Thats fine but primary problem is that only one connection is used at a time
> but I want to utilize both at the same time. Please guide
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Jorge Evangelista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: lar
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:23:23PM -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 06/21/07 17:18, Alex Samad wrote:
> >sorry yep, just woken up, reading and answering whilst eating breakfast
>
> *nod*
>
> >okay then why not
> >
> >default via preffered path
> >default
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 04:24:19PM -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 06/21/07 16:01, Alex Samad wrote:
> >should something like this work
> >
> >default proto static metric 5
> > nexthop via 58.173.108.1 dev vlan2 weight 10
> > nexthop via 10.20.20.106 d
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:35:13PM +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Grant Taylor wrote:
>
> >I need a way for the Linux kernel to try to use a default gateway and
> >switch to another one if it does not see any traffic.
should something like this work
default proto static metric 5 nexthop via
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:35:46PM -0500, Greg Scott wrote:
> > out of curiosity why would you want to bridge at the firewall. is
> this meant to be a drop in-line firewall appliance
>
> Long story but yes, it is essentially a drop in-line system. It's a
> mess.
>
> So will that Internet rout
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:54:46PM -0500, Greg Scott wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Still plugging away at my Linux bridge/firewall and thinking through the
> consequences. In a normal firewall situation, the Internet is on one
> side, the internal LAN on the other. Duh! But now, with a Linux bridge
> in th
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:50:30AM +0800, Salim S I wrote:
> I solved it, thought a bit ugly.
>
> Have two more rules now in ip ru
>
> 32150: from all lookup main
> 32201: from all fwmark 0x200/0x200 lookup wan1_route
> 32202: from all fwmark 0x400/0x400 lookup wan2_route
> 32203: from 10.20.
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:48:01PM +0800, Salim S I wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Luciano Ruete [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 11:28 AM
> To: Salim S I
> Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Multihome load balancing - kernel vs netfilter
>
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:34:34PM +0100, francesco messineo wrote:
> I solved this exact problem (with incoming connections on three
> different adsl) markin packets on PREROUTING chain. Obviously with
> three different routing tables.
>
> # incoming connections for DNAT to DMZ need to be marked
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:22:13AM +0530, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> On 3/2/07, Tom Lobato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Hi all!
> >
> >
> >After that good thread "DGD patch not detecting dead gateway" I was
> >able to set up a Load Balancing with ping based DGD (without Julian
> >Ana
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:12:17AM +0700, Denny Zulfikar wrote:
> Hello korey,
>
> I don't think your configuration will work well, because there're
> balancing using "weight" connection. So, if you have
> connection-oriented-application that must sure passing their traffic
> only from one connect
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:23:42PM +0800, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
> From: "Luciano Ruete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This solution works in theory and in practice, so plz, get your hands dirty
> > before you post your next great idea.
> >
>
> I understand your explanation fully but believe me I
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:30:48AM +0100, Paul Viney wrote:
> > > I still seem to have much the same problem. I no longer get ICMP
> > > unreachable errors, but the packet just seems to disappear - I can't see
> > > it being forwarded on any interface, nor can I find any kind of reply -
> > > icmp
p route get to 192.168.12.5 iif eth1 gives
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
try
ip r g from 192.168.12.5, I seem to be getting the
same error as you
>
> Am I not understanding how "ip route get" works? The man pages are fairly
> succinct in their explanation.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:50:13PM +0100, Paul Viney wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to set up a computer with 2 routes to the internet, much as
> described at http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html .One of my
> interfaces (eth5, 192.168.2.2) is only used for traffic originating i
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:17:03PM +0100, Fabio Muzzi wrote:
>
> Hi, this is my first post to the list.
>
> I have googled a lot, and still cannot find a proper solution. I hope
> someone here will be able to shed some light on my doubts.
>
> I have set up a firewall using kernel 2.6.15
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:14:56AM +0900, GodSharp wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Just wondering for some reason when I switched providers(DSL) IP aliasing
> stopped working. And, I am not sure what kind of modem this is, the previous
> one had some Ethernet ports at the back(it has a bult-in 4 port switch
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:53:23PM +, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> I'm not aware of one, and I think it's an excellent idea.
>
> There's some great software available for LARTC, and some of the
> documentation is very good, but unfortunately it's all a bit disparate.
> A wiki would be a great star
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Jordi Segues wrote:
> >the above is actually covered in the wiki howto. Bu tyou need to setup
> >snat on
> >each interface, then connection tracking takes care of sending each stream
> >out
> >the right interface, you need to use snat and not MASQ.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:03:21AM +0100, Jordi Segues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've done this some montsh ago, with a command like:
> ip route add default equalize scope global nexthop via $EXTGW1 dev
> $EXTIF1 weight 1 nexthop via $EXTGW2 dev $EXTIF2 weight 1
>
> However, this is not the problem.
>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 06:44:54PM -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 01/15/07 15:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Wow, that's a complicated solution. Nicely done:) But I think that's a
> >bit too complicated for my setup thx for the input anyway.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Indeed the set up is not simple.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:54:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a linux server running kernel 2.6.19 that is connected with 2
> seperate 100Mbit links to the same isp:
>
>
> +---+
> +---+ | I |
32 matches
Mail list logo
