,
Alexander Atanasov
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
Hi,
just simple note. Maybe it is already in progress :)
There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to
consider IPs or ports.
What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP
adresses and then smaller WRR for ports per IP ?
It
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Don Cohen wrote:
Alexander Atanasov writes:
I don't see why that should be the case. And I don't recall ever
observing it. This adaptation time should be practically zero.
There's no work in making the queues equal.
When queues get full sfq have
Hi there!
On Wed, 05 Jun 2002 16:19:41 +0500
Alexey Talikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I rename files gzip its and attach to this mail but don't change
anything patch kernel and tc
I'll put them somewhere on the web tonight and provide an url.
Note it give you equal division
Hi there!
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Vladimir Trebicky wrote:
Sorry for my incompetence. I didn't noticed that readme included in some of
Alexes posts. Module works fine only if I do
qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq
when I do
qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq hash dst
the
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Don Cohen wrote:
extensions
And all the discussions tend to lead to the conclusion that there should
be an sfq option (when the queue is created) for:
a) how big the hash is
b) whether to take into account source ports or not
c) whether to take
by the Free Software Foundation; either version
+ * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * Authors:Alexey Kuznetsov, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ *
+ * Changes:Alexander Atanasov, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ * Added depth,limit,divisor,hash_kind options
