Re: [LARTC] simple tbf rate clamping issues

2007-08-22 Thread Bryan Schenker
My first guess would be vlans being a problem. I know at least for class based queuing disciplines on vlans, you have to take care to define filters that funnel traffic through a class by selecting 802.1q traffic on the real interface, not the vlan interface. I know traffic shaping does

Re: [LARTC] simple tbf rate clamping issues

2007-08-22 Thread Bryan Schenker
not be held long enough in the tbf and had to be droppd, correct? Thank you, sting -- Bryan Schenker Director ResTech Services www.restechservices.net 608-663-3868 ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi

Re: [LARTC] simple tbf rate clamping issues

2007-08-22 Thread Bryan Schenker
list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc -- Bryan Schenker Director ResTech Services www.restechservices.net 608-663-3868 ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin

RE: [LARTC] Trying understand the HTB

2007-08-15 Thread Bryan Schenker
To limit bandwidth to your 192.168.10.11 host, you need to be rate limiting on the eth0 interface not the eth1 interface if I understand how your router is plugged in. tc limits bandwidth leaving an interface. So right now as the rules are written, you are limiting to 500kbit the