[LARTC] Adding HTB support for kernel 2.4.19 SUSE 8.1

Hi everybody, I've got a little problem when adding HTB support to my SUSE 8.1 by patching its kernel 2.4.19. After i patch kernel getting some errors, the HTB kernel option shows up but when i make modules it finds something wrong with the sch_htb.o module. Could somebody give me a hand on

Re: [LARTC] Download and upload independency

gn one whole htb class for ACK packets,if i am not using priority bands (just ensuring VoIP´s QoS) is it so simple as asignate them a low bandwidth (1Kb) and higher priority? Thanks a lot. -Diego gypsy escribió: Diego Cabrero wrote: Hello everyone: As it is known, when you limit up

[LARTC] Download and upload independency

Hello everyone: As it is known, when you limit uplink bandwidth it usually gets downlink bandwidth to a lower value. I just want to know what is the optimal configuration for eth1 and imq0 according to some variables of tc(HTB), txqueuelen, mtu, etc. to make these packet flows less independent

Re: [LARTC] Re: Simple shaping question

et the same rate and ceil. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc -- Firma Diego Cabrero Ingeniero en Automática y Electrónica Ind. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. 983

Re: [LARTC] Re: Simple shaping question

ist LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc -- Diego Cabrero Ingeniero en Automática y Electrónica Ind. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. 983 36 13 23 - Fax 983 34 19 86 Fundación ATTICO Fundación de Apoyo Tecnol

Re: [LARTC] Simple shaping question

Title: Firma Also, there's a mistake in your tc filter line, change classid by flowid. Take a look at the man page. -Diego Diego Cabrero escribió: Try chosing a lower limit for the 80th port at least 900-10, then add a sfq qdisc down the 1:10, 1:20 and 1:30 classes like this: tc

Re: [LARTC] Simple shaping question

Try chosing a lower limit for the 80th port at least 900-10, then add a sfq qdisc down the 1:10, 1:20 and 1:30 classes like this: tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:x0 handle 1: sfq perturb 10 It will work, i had that kind of problem before. Regards. -Diego Jonas Jasas escribió: I have linu

[LARTC] Marking Packets on VoIP connections

Hi there,... I know this topic may not belongs to this list, but it is crucial for me to get packets marked on this VoIP application. The diagram to understand the problem is showed on the next line... VoIP SIP phone+GW >>eth0[SERVER1]eth1, tun0>--->( INTERNET-VPN)>--->eth1,tun0[SERVER2]e

Re: [LARTC] Uplink shapping

he network might help us understand. On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Diego Cabrero wrote: Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:07:28 +0100 From: Diego Cabrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] Uplink shapping Hi everyone, I'm controling the uplink traffic bandwidth betwee

[LARTC] Uplink shapping

I'm going crazy, this problem has got me pretty worried and i'm not figuring out at all, the reasons why this weird bug happens. I'd appreciate some help guys. thanks -Diego -- Diego Cabrero Ingeniero en Automática y Electrónica Ind. [EMAIL PROTECTED