Re: [LARTC] Problems in Dead Gateway Detection / Failover - Multiple ISP Links

Hi! Did you finally write a script for dead gateway detection beyond first hop? Did you find any other solution to this problem? I'm quite interested and I bet other multipath users here are interested too. My linux router has 10 dsl links (adding 15 more in short), when one of the dsl routers

Re: [LARTC] load balancing: per route or per interface?

Hi! Load balancing with VLANs works like a charm, right now I'm balancing 10 ADSL lines, but I will be adding about 15 more in short :) Still, I can't get it to work with 2.6 :( I'm missing features like hashlimit module in netfilter. Someone suggested it had to do with my hardware, lspci shows:

Re: [LARTC] Kernel panic with load balancing

:24 +0100, Eduardo Fernández wrote: 0 Kernel panic - not syncing:Fatal exception in interrupt Any ideas? Thank you very much! Is it a SIS chipset and an Intel cpu? Reading some kernel sources, I finally (after *months* of trouble) found the problem I had with a customer. I used a router

Re: [LARTC] load balancing and fault tolerance in networking

Hi, On 3/23/06, Fabio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I'm studying load balancing and fault tolerance using multiple WAN interfaces. I follow the howto in http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt but the problem is that faults detected are limited only in link between lan gateway and modem/router adsl,

Re: [LARTC] load balancing: per route or per interface?

On 3/16/06, Jakub Wartak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dnia środa, 15 marca 2006 16:42, Eduardo Fernández napisał: Hi! I'm doing load balancing for 5 dsl lines, each one with a dsl router attached to a linux machine ethernet plug. The problem is that I'm adding 15 more dsl lines, and I don't

Re: [LARTC] multipath algorithm

Seems really interesting, I also noticed this in kernel sources but I didn't try it since I didn't see it in any howtos out there. I'm using load balancing with Julian's patch for 5 dsl lines but I will be adding 20 more in short, so I may try out this. BTW Julian's patch didn't work for me with

[LARTC] load balancing: per route or per interface?

Hi! I'm doing load balancing for 5 dsl lines, each one with a dsl router attached to a linux machine ethernet plug. The problem is that I'm adding 15 more dsl lines, and I don't have enough PCI slots in the linux machine to sum up 20 ethernet plugs (I already have 2 quad ethernet cards). So I'm

Re: [LARTC] load balancing: per route or per interface?

Hi, On 3/15/06, Nelson Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I'm considering connecting all dsl routers and the linux machine to a switch and doing load balancing per route, instead of per interface. What are the problems? AFAIK I won't be able to do traffic shaping, anything else? Why

[LARTC] Kernel panic with load balancing

Hi! I've 5 DSL routers and a linux router in a switch. The linux router is doing NAT for a LAN network, but it freezes when I set up load balancing with this command: ip route add default proto static\ nexthop via 192.168.1.10 dev eth1\ nexthop via 192.168.1.20 dev eth1\

[LARTC] Re: Kernel panic with load balancing

Hi there, I solved the problem by switching back to a 2.4 kernel. Don't know what's wrong with 2.6. Greets, Edu On 3/8/06, Eduardo Fernández [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I've 5 DSL routers and a linux router in a switch. The linux router is doing NAT for a LAN network, but it freezes when

[LARTC] Two linux routers with DSL

to reduce as much as possible the load in the dsl router, so I'd like the big router to do NAT. How should I configure both routers? Thank you very much for your help! Eduardo Fernández ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl

[LARTC] [OT] snmp not reporting traffic values for a network interface

Hi all! I know this is quite offtopic, but I found nothing in google nor in the net-snmp mailing list, and I know there's a lot of people here graphing with snmp+rrdtool. I installed net-snmp 5.1.2-6.1 in Debian to produce graphs for some ethernet interfaces. It seems it's not reporting correct

[LARTC] Packet loss with htb+sfq+l7filter

Hi all! I'm trying to shape traffic in a dorm's network (4 mbit symmetrical internet link, about 200 computers, heavy p2p usage). The router is a p4xeon running linux 2.6.9 with the qnet patches (http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/qnet/). When I activate ip_forward I get 20% packet loss and a lot of

Re: [LARTC] Packet loss with htb+sfq+l7filter

Yeah, 4 mbit, that is, 512 kbps. Notice the command line: CEIL=500 (...) rate ${CEIL}kbps ceil ${CEIL}kbps El lun, 15-11-2004 a las 23:29 +0100, mjoachimiak escribió: Ypu said ypu've got 4Mbit. As far as I'm concerned 4Mbit= 1024*4=4096 So link capacity

Re: [LARTC] Packet loss with htb+sfq+l7filter

, Eduardo Fernández wrote: (http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/qnet/). When I activate ip_forward I get 20% packet loss and a lot of duplicates. Any ideas? I attach my shaping well we've done something similar but instead of using a route we used a bridge (acting as traffic shaper and firewall). So you