trees into one inbound tree on the external interface, just like the
outbound tree.
Ingress shaping *is* very useful and it's a pity that Linux has taken this
long to gain support for it.
--
Flemming Frandsen, NrVissing.Net administrator.
___
LARTC
Samuel Díaz García wrote:
Try IMQ (Intermediate Message Queue) http://www.linuximq.net.
I've seen it and tried it, but for some reason the imq module I built on
another machine than the router (it boots from flash, so no gcc) didn't
work, the module loaded correctly, but I couldn't
and this problem will
mostly be solved.
However, there are some cases where IMQ/IFB is useful. I don't want
to bash these intermediary devices, they're just abused too many
times.
Well, shaping incoming traffic correctly is exactly what IMQ/IFB was
written for, so it's hardly abuse.
--
Flemming
Alexey Toptygin wrote:
No, attaching to the input is just as easy as to the output. The reason
that isn't implemented is that it wouldn't really be useful.
You are full of it.
What everybody who asks for shaping want is mainly ingress shaping and
it works just fine.
When TCP starts to
Hariett Jones wrote:
I want server to share bandwith from eth0 evenly for users on eth1
and wlan0. How can i make it ? Is it possible ? As far as i know htb
splits outgoing bandwith on one device only.
This is the most braindead defect of Linux (IMHO): You can't, because
you can only shape
Hotny wrote:
I want to use traffic control for a resource controller for a multimedia
middleware platform. Is there a library or syscalls, so that I don't
have to use the Systemcommands?
Why would you want to do that?
There is nothing sinful or expensive about calling other programs from
Jody Shumaker wrote:
I have never seen anything coming from the mark unless you specify it.
I have.
I'm honestly not really sure how setting a mark of 0x14806 can
automatically set it to go to flowid 1:4806.
Because someone wrote it to do that, a mark of 0xdadface will map to
flowid
1 fw
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
As I already said - you don't need handle 1
I tried removing it, but it didn't make any difference.
Am I correct in assuming that the reason that the 'parent 1:' part isn't
needed is because it comes from the mark?
--
Flemming Frandsen, NrVissing.Net
if something goes
wrong.
I'll just keep going with 2.4 and the suboptimal shaper until I have
access to the serial console on the machine (which means installing a
second soekris at the same location.
--
Flemming Frandsen, NrVissing.Net administrator
When I run this:
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw
I get:
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
The traditional interpretation of that gnarly error message is that
cls_fw is missing, but lsmod | grep cls_fw gets me:
cls_fw 2336 4 (autoclean)
I
Muthukumar S wrote:
On 1/10/06, Flemming Frandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I run this:
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw
I get:
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
You are missing the flowid. For example
tc filter add dec eth0 parent 1: protocol ip
gypsy wrote:
I recommend that you look here. It may not be what you want, but it
certainly is worth checking out even if it turns out not to be your
answer: http://www.shurdix.org/
I'm not going to change the entire OS just to get the traffic shaping
set up and the traffic shaper in
I have a network with around 40 /24 subnets that shares a common DSL,
this cries out for shaping so here I am trying to make it work as my
first tc project.
I have managed to cargocult some snippets from this list and tried to
come up with a config, but there are a few things that I'd really
13 matches
Mail list logo
