Re: [LARTC] HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS post. Ahhhh)

On dom, 2007-11-04 at 23:04 +1100, Fog_Watch wrote: > HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. Is it? Any pointers? -- Giovanni Bajo ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

[LARTC] Low-priority traffic

even tried the CBQ version of wondershaper, but I got the same results. Do you have any suggestion about how can I achieve my expected behaviour? How should I modify wondershaper? Thanks! -- Giovanni Bajo ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc