Hello everyone, it is not the first time i discuss this topic here, but now
it has come the time to actually do it.
My idea is to set up a daemon to run QoS on linux, with a particularity, add
some A.I. capabilities to our system and hence, be able to change QoS
"topology" every certain time to ob
Hi there guys, i am on my last year of career, and as my final Project i am
interested in doing something about QoS.
The thing is, I have a couple of QoS solutions working, and since the
beginning I though it was great but it lacked some kind of dynamicity.
Let me explain myself.. I was thinking
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: lunes, 31 de mayo de 2004 2:34
Para: GoMi
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [LARTC] Odd question about load balancing
Hello GoMi,
> Hello there, i have a very special case about load balancing...
---snip
> And I have the next problem:
> Both routers
Hello there, i have a very special case about load balancing...
Here is my setup:
++/
|| |
there would make sense...
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En
nombre de Ed Wildgoose
Enviado el: martes, 18 de mayo de 2004 12:52
Para: GoMi
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [LARTC] RV: LATENCY PROBLEMS
>The load balancing is working great, we are do
I thought of creating an htb class for each user, but as you said I haven't
got enough bw to do soo.
Thats why my setup only has 5 classes with WRR queues so I get sure each
user doesnt affects the other users. On top of that I have an iplimit to a
maximum of 15 parallel connections per user.
S
nombre de Roy
Enviado el: viernes, 14 de mayo de 2004 18:20
Para: GoMi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [LARTC] RV: LATENCY PROBLEMS
You did not say, what kind of interactive traffic you have,
and is your dsl capable to hold it
800 connections should not be a problem for such cpu,
if you are sure you
Hello there,
I'm having lots of problems with my setup here. Let me explain:
I am network administrator for my university dorm. We are about 300 users,
and we have 2 ADSL connections doing load balancing with 300kbits upstream
and 2Mbit downstream.
The load balancing is working great, we are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there, i have a question reguarding WRR. I have a box with 2 ethernets, i am doing
nat, and i have a question. Since i am doing egress traffic, and its done after
natting, if i use wrr with src and masq options, will it get the real source addre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you mike, its doing great right now. I didnt notice on my script. Thank you ;)
- -Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Mike Miller
Enviado el: miércoles, 04 de febrero de 2004 17:58
Para: GoMi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I forgot to tell you, i am with load balancing with 2 DSL connectios also doing
natting on my machine..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBQCEwnH7diNnrrZKsEQIGxgCfWuKXVFV/7hu6YqIEjMvBqH59hxkAn3b0
UpjrpQWYDFt8vnaiERK3er2w
=uBcX
nombre de Mike Miller
Enviado el: miércoles, 04 de febrero de 2004 17:58
Para: GoMi
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: [LARTC] limiting p2p
> iptables -t mangle -i eth2 -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p
> -j
> MARK --set-mark 2
> iptables -t mangle -i eth2 -A PREROUTI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is my config
iptables -t mangle -i eth2 -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
iptables -t mangle -i eth2 -A PREROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t mangle -i eth2 -A PREROUTING -p icmp -j MARK --set-mark 4
iptabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there, i am having really big troubles setting up ipp2p. I have a woody with kernel
upgraded to 2.4.20 and iptables 1.2.8. I changed the makefile to include these
modifications, but still it captures no traffic at all.. Do i need to run it under
Read the Nano-howto, yo might find some info...Thats only for multipath
gateways, but... :)
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En
nombre de Eddie
Enviado el: lunes, 02 de febrero de 2004 12:20
Para: lartc
Asunto: [LARTC] adsl on/off
Good day all
Now I'm fro
Hi there folks :) I installed the ipp2p module v0.5a (i had 0.4 as well)
to classify p2p traffic.
I have it loaded and working:
Module Size Used byNot tainted
ipt_ipp2p 2656 2
And i have the CONNMARK module to mark traffic:
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering, most of the p2p programs are bandwith wasters, because they open lots
of parallel connections.
I have 5 queues to prioritize traffic, but these p2p open thousands of connections and
my systems gets REALLY HIGH latence.
Does anyb
I have a setup based on htb and sfq qdiscs.
When more than 100 users get connected to my lan, my internet setup
works considerably bad.
- I have a linux box with 1 eth card going to my switch (where the hubs
connect to) and to eth cards to both adsl (2Mbit each) doing load
balancing
- My questi
Hi there, i am going to explain you my setup and post you my scripts in
case they are of any help to anybody :)
This mail is a little long, but i think the only way you can undestandme
is writing you my whole code..
1.- I have to ADSL connections connected through ehternet cards eth0 and
eth1 to t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there, i have a setup based on hight disponibility and load balancing, and when any
of the adsl lines stops working, the kernel does not recognices that the route is
down, and my clients only get access to the internet if they are luckilly NATed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering this morning, why unstead of having load balancing, use one ADSL
router just for interactive traffic, and a second one just for p2p programs for
example? Has anybody ever used this setup. Wouldn't NAT get crazy? Just a thought...
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there, i actually already told you about this problem, but i cant find a way to
solve it. Let me explain my self again:
- -I have 2 dsl connections, so i do load balacing.
- -My QoS setup is based on htb on both ethernets:
iptables -t mangle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a question here, i am wondering if changing my setup. I have a linux firewall
doing QoS and load balancing with 3 ethernets.
I have to DSL connections running at 2Mbit each. So, i was wondering, can i change
this setup to set up to bri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am doing traffic shaping with HTB, and my msn messenger version 6 automatically
disconnects every 5 minutes or so. Anyboyd had the same problem? I am driving myself
mad. Thank you!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBP3tT3H7d
I have no idea what you are talking about, since i never saw that email. If
you want to filter traffic, anaylize the paquet contents, searching for a
string common on kazaa packets and http traffic packets, so you can mark
then and hence redirect them to the correct queue. ¿Get what i say?
I am using load balancing, as far as i know, since both links have different
public ip's a connection has to go through the same router. A connections
means a http request to download a page, an ftp connection, telnet etc.., It
has to go though the asme router because it needs to have the same p
I know this is not the right place to ask this question, but i have an
stateful firewall and i am doing CONNTRACKING to mark the tcp connections,
and then with filters based on fw marks put them in the right qdisc.
The problem is that i have an uplink bandwith of 300kbit restricted to
250kbit b
A question here, i am having problems shaping the acks, due to p2p programs,
how can i do the --restore-mark on a full connection, including acks? i have
really no idea how...
_
Charla con tus amigos en línea mediante MSN Messenger
I still dont get it..i think its like this, correct me if i am wrong:
When a connection is new, a number is given to it and hence we know how to
dnatet when the response comes. That mark has nocing to do with the mark
given by the MARK value
hence -j CONNMARK --save-mark will save that number,
Hi there, i have some questions regarding CONNMARK and STRING modules for
netfilter.
I have a stateful firewall doing contraking, because i have two dsl
connections doing load balancing. I have found a way to discriminate KaZaA
traffic flowing via port 80 from normal HTTP traffic using the stri
Hello, this is my first message to the board, so please excuse me if i am
omiting any prestablished rule ;)
Let me explain you my problem..
I have 300 users, studens, wich automatically means Edonkey,KaZaa,and most
of this peer to peer sharing programs.
I actually have 2 x 2Mbit ADSL's. My sol
31 matches
Mail list logo