Ed Wildgoose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You need something which works at IP level or above. TCP (level higher) has
> some stuff, but (I repeat) it basically involves dropping traffic until the
> sender slows down. There are protocols like ECN, but they are broadly
> unsupported. ICMP stuff
Andreas Klauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think there was a patch on the BT mailing list a few weeks ago
> that solves this random port problem (on your side). Other clients
> of course can choose whatever ports they like.
Why does bittorrent need to use more than one port in the first plac
Matteo Brusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:20 handle 20: sfq perturb 10
I'm using sfq as well. But I'm wondering if I wouldn't be better off with
pfifo with a short queue. One of the entries in the HTB f
Matteo Brusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I have a typical configuration for my firewall/gateway box: single network
> card, with a pppoe connection to the DSL modem.
> I'm already successfully shaping the uplink (how come that the
> wondershaper.htb doesn't use the ceil parameter? It shou
Sanjay Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry to interrupt the flow, especially being a newbie, but won´t the
> sender just retransmit the dropped packets at the same rate?
no.
> I am not so thorogh with TCP/IP, but is there something in the protocol that
> speeds or slows the transmission.
Jason Boxman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 08 June 2004 23:33, Greg Stark wrote:
> >
> > Well ultimately all shaping works by dropping packets. Merely delaying
> > transmission isn't going to slow down anything in the long run, just
> > increase t
Damion de Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg,
> > For some reason that hadn't occurred to me. That should work just fine. I
> > guess I should mark the packets in iptables to avoid throttling traffic from
> > gateway itself, or does match see the external ip?
>
> The only (common) time you ne
Damion de Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You can create different ingress policers that only match specific ports, and
> give them different priorities, but that still won't work as well as using IMQ,
> or if your box is a gateway (and you are only shaping traffic going through it),
> then yo
[I sent this earlier but I guess the list is subscriber-only?]
I just set up wondershaper, it has a simple filter on the downstream
direction to limit the bandwidth usage:
tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle : ingress
tc filter add dev $DEV parent : protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \
0.0
