Re: [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread

2004-07-11 Thread James Sneeringer
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 04:51:40PM -0600, Glen Mabey wrote: > Could anyone else recommend other manufacturers of this type of > hardware: an embedded system board with > * a couple of NICs > * PCMCIA > * runs linux Try Soekris or Acrosser. Both make boards that work with Linux. http://www.soekr

Re: [LARTC] Can the mailing list archive be searched?

2004-07-06 Thread James Sneeringer
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 02:04:41PM -0500, Jonathan S. Polacheck wrote: > It says the list has been "picked up" by google, but I can't find any > reference to "lartc". "Picked up" by Google just means Google is spidering the list archives, so you can do a Google search that is restricted to the arc

Re: FW: [LARTC] Static ip addresses/aliases previously (my mistake) htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

2004-07-06 Thread James Sneeringer
[Sorry if this is received twice. Sent it with the wrong address once, not sure if the moderator will approve it.] On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Chris Bolton wrote: > Ok I'm not the best at ASCII diagrams but here goes anyway... (well I'll > modify the one in the advanced routing howt

Re: [LARTC] Static ip addresses/aliases previously (my mistake) htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

2004-07-05 Thread James Sneeringer
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 05:14:20PM +0100, Chris Bolton wrote: > No I am using the EN5861, just that we have two ADSL lines and only one > EN5861 and rather than buying another I'd like to use linux to do the same > job as the en5861, if you know what I mean. You can, but since you have two ADSL li

Re: [LARTC] why dont packets go where i want?

2002-10-18 Thread James Sneeringer
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:41:42AM +0200, Stef Coene wrote: > There is a -m helper option so you can load additional modules. There is a > module that matches ftp packets (both data and control), but I don't know the > syntax. A google search on "iptables -m helper ftp" will help > http://www.n

Re: [LARTC] why dont packets go where i want?

2002-10-17 Thread James Sneeringer
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:44:13AM +0200, Francois Dessart wrote: > ftp-data20/tcp > ftp-data20/udp > ftp 21/tcp > ftp 21/udp > FTP data (passive) use port 20. This is incorrect. Both standard and passive FTP use tcp/21 as a control channel (logins, command

Re: [LARTC] Rip problems

2002-09-30 Thread James Sneeringer
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 01:46:37PM -0400, Joseph Watson wrote: | EXPORT_GATEWAY="no" | SILENT="no" This should cause the equivalent of "routed -s" to be run. The "-s" tells routed to send routing updates. Check with "ps ax". You can get further debugging out of it with "-d" and "-t". | When

Re: [LARTC] how to log pacets which hit routing rules?

2002-08-29 Thread James Sneeringer
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:17:55PM +0200, Wojtek wrote: | Jan Macek wrote: | >Is there some way to make iproute2 log to syslog or to a file selected | >packets? | | use the iptables or ipchains with --log switch iptables does not have a --log switch. You must use the '-j LOG' target instead. -