[LARTC] Attacing a RED to a CBQ

Hi all,   I've create a cbq qdisc on an 100Mbit link and I attached a cbq class to it with a rate of 15Mbit (borrow). Now I would like to attach a RED qdisc to that class, but I'm a little confused by the REDs parameters. What should I choose for the bandwidth (100Mbit or 15Mbit) and what ar

[LARTC] Filter Protocol

Hi all, A short question. If you specify a protocol with a filter e.g. #tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip tc ... will this filter match every packet that has the specified protocol (IP) in one of its headers or only in the outer most header? If I encapsulate the IP packet with f.e.

Re: [LARTC] kernel packet traveling diagram

nel packet traveling diagram. Thanks a lot > to Julian Anastasov by his comments (notes at the end as I understood). > > I insist it's nice to have this diagram ready and updated. Look that > when Jan Coppens needed to tell us where he does need to mark packets > he just said &q

Re: [LARTC] Re: iptables diagram (ex: ipchains + mark in output chain ?)

Hi all, Is it possible to mark packets (fwmark in mangle table of some sort) after ingress policing and before Input routing? I need the ingress policer (ingress queue), to filter and classify packets first, then the firewall has to filter them again and set the fwmark. All this has to be done be

Re: [LARTC] Why this stupid ingress tc does not work ?

- Original Message - From: "ludo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:22 AM Subject: [LARTC] Why this stupid ingress tc does not work ? > Hi ! > > I wanted to shape my analog modem connection so I took these two lines > from the 'wondershaper' scri

Re: [LARTC] SFQ buckets/extensions

- Original Message - From: "Michael T. Babcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:18 PM Subject: RE: [LARTC] SFQ buckets/extensions > > In a long term always droping from the largest subqueue > > gives you equal subqueues. > > And, of course, one

[LARTC] SFQ + RED

Hi all, Is there any implemented qdisc that combines the benefits of a SFQ with those of a RED queue. Something like a FRED, CBT or DWRED? thx, Jan ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://

Re: [LARTC] Ultimate Traffic Conditioner

- Original Message - From: "bert hubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jan Coppens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:32 AM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Ultimate Traffic Conditioner > On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:20:

[LARTC] Ultimate Traffic Conditioner

Hi all,   When I try to run the ultimate traffic conditioner (cbq implementation), I get this strange output:     /tc# ./ultimate /tc# tc filter show dev eth1filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 803: ht divisor 1filter parent 1: protocol ip pref

Re: [LARTC] Ingress policing

- Original Message - From: "bert hubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Ingress policing > On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:09:14PM +0200, Jan Coppens wrote: > > Hi all, > > > >

[LARTC] Ingress policing

Hi all,   Currently, I'm experimenting with ingress policing. Is it possible to attach multiple u32 filters to the same policer or attach one policer to multiple u32 filters? I would like to define a shared meter, so the rate of the traffic that matches any u32 is accumulated. In the "Edge32-