Re: [LARTC] IPSec tunnel problem

sec eroute will let you see all 4 tunnels, not just 1 and you have to know that routes are in place to allow traffic to flow in all 4 directions. - -- Jason A. Pattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xperience, Inc. (http://www.xperienceinc.com) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comme

Re: [LARTC] Wondershaper breaks IPSec tunnels

higher priority traffic when present. | which means they get set to the rate value, and unless you've changed | the way it calculates it's percentage rate values, the sum of the leaf | rates can exceed the parent. | which i believe can lead to weird and/or bad behaviour. Hmm. Guess I&#x

Re: [LARTC] Wondershaper breaks IPSec tunnels

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am I silently being told that this is the wrong question to ask of this list? :) Jason A. Pattie wrote: | Hello, been awhile since I've written. | | I now have a situation where I get to use traffic shaping for a client. | ~ We implemente

Re: [LARTC] viruses

something like P2PWall, I think. There are even extensions that have been integrated with the IPCop firewall distro to block Kazaa (couldn't get them to work, but that's a different story). - -- Jason A. Pattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xperience, Inc. (http://www.xperienceinc.com) -BEGIN P

Re: [LARTC] viruses

essor and RAM, especially). The company I work for has worked on integrating antivirus support into DansGuardian in order to allow for scanning all incoming web content for virii. We also use MailScanner/SpamAssassin. You can check them out at http://www.pcxperience.org. - -- Jason A. Pattie [

[LARTC] Wondershaper breaks IPSec tunnels

ev $DEV2 parent 1: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \ ~ match ip sport 3389 0xffff \ ~ flowid 1:10 Are these even valid? Thank you for your time. - -- Jason A. Pattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xperience, Inc. (http://www.xperienceinc.com) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.

Re: [LARTC] How to recognize P2P

to the name you provide. It apparently only works when the device is available (i.e., loaded as a module or detected by the kernel) and down. I.e., it cannot be in an UP state. With a little experimentation, you can insert the nameif command into your startup scripts and all your problems dissappear

Re: [LARTC] Routing between two RFC1918 networks.

squerade the address from 10.4.2.0 onto > 10.4.7.0 > and vice-versa. > Am I missing something obvious? > Cheers, > Dave. > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > be

Re: [LARTC] udp broadcast over ipsec

also. Is their any thing that can be done to send B'cast also. Any help here will be much appriciated. I am working though Xmas to get this working :( > > raj > > ___ > LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.ds9a.nl

Re: [LARTC] iproute + mark question

the script, in this way the rule will > be threated first, see with "ip rule" the order ok. > hope that helps thanks. -- Jason A. Pattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. __

Re: [LARTC] iproute + mark question

how to route internally for some reason even though the source address is the iDSL which it show know everything it needs to know about in order to route it back into the internal network. Does routing table 1 need to have routes to the internal network? I wouldn't think so, but I could

Re: [LARTC] Routing with two providers

the route using >>either the 'route' command or 'ip route'. >> >If you try to add different metric to the different >alternative routes this is not possible by design. All alternative >routes have same metric valu

Re: [LARTC] Routing with two providers

a metric to the route using either the 'route' command or 'ip route'. -- Jason A. Pattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/