Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-16 Thread Joachim Wickman
> > But your idea of one class / ip is something I'm thinking of to make now. > > So I don't need to fill in the MAC or IP when a new client comes to town. > So not all classes will be actvive? For performance considerations, only the > active classes are important. Right now there are about 20-30

Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-16 Thread Joachim Wickman
Thanks for the answer. How many classes can HTB take? I use 4-6 interfaces / computer and 2 pools / interface which is has 62 addresses each. So there would be about 512 classes if I make one for each address. > I think this came from some mails of about 6 or 8 months ago on the LARTC > list, no

[LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-12 Thread Joachim Wickman
Hi   I've searched the archive for a solution where I want to limit/shape WLAN users. I only know's their MAC, because they get their IP from dhcp.   > Why not, just use negative offsets with U32 to access>the 14-byte eth frame header before the IP header:>>Decimal Ofs Description>-

[LARTC] MAC addresses in linux router

2003-02-24 Thread Joachim Wickman
Hi, I use Linux boxes as routers and wonders if it's possible to have them to "copy" the MAC address, so my firewall can toggle on MAC addresses. Now it only see the routers MAC address, so everyone behind can go through my firewall. // Joachim __

[LARTC] Transparent shaper

2002-11-06 Thread Joachim Wickman
Hello, Is it possible to make a shaper (with QoS) transparent? No IPs to the shaper, only a bridge with 2 NICs ? // Joachim ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] Computer

2002-08-03 Thread Joachim Wickman
Hello, How powerful computer do I need when I want to trafic shape & firewall a 2Mbit Internet line? // Joachim ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Hammer protection

2002-07-01 Thread Joachim Wickman
Hi > I think you can only limit the number of syn-pakets like you already > proposed. I tried to switch the params as you said, but no success. It took maybe a minute before I did get in to the site, but after that I could logout and in as fast as I wanted. (hammering) Mabye the only way is the

[LARTC] Hammer protection

2002-07-01 Thread Joachim Wickman
Hi, Is it possible to use iptables as hammeprotection ? I want to deny a user who has just logged off .. for about 10seconds. I tried with this, but that didn't work. Maybe my mind is going completely in the wrong direction today? =) iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -s 0/0 -d $my_ip --dport 2