Dear All,
I know that it's not a problem that can be attached
to lartc but I need a guru who can explain what can be the problem with this
connection. I connect to an ftp server. All firewalls are off and on a gateway I
get this tcpdump:
09:11:30.207400 10.1.0.7.19018 >
212.92.18.38.ftp:
> Without proto static if one of the gateways is a PPP connection or PPPOE
> then that gateway will be removed if the connection goes down.
I haven't patched the kernel with dead gateway detector patches. Links
are stable. I can manually modify config if a line drops.
> With PPP or PPPOE connecti
May I ask you something?
What is the difference between these:
10.5.0.0/16 proto static
nexthop via 10.0.1.6 dev eth1 weight 1
nexthop via 10.0.1.8 dev eth1 weight 1
AND
10.5.0.0/16
nexthop via 10.0.1.6 dev eth1 weight 1
nexthop via 10.0.1.8 dev eth1 weight 1
Hi Kim,
>
> Read this doc:
>
> http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt
Thanks. I had successfully set up that each connection is estabilished on
other line but it's not an optimal solution for me. Is there a way I can
route 50% of traffic put on 1 line? It would be good for me if every second
packet would
Hi all,
I've read all howtos at lartc.org but I still don't know how to share
packets between two uplinks. I used iptables/ROUTE target which works on
router box. In this case I can't use that because this box do masquerading
and i can't match destination ip at the prerouting chain in mangle table
Hi,
>
> iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -p tcp -o eth0 -s 0/0 --dport ftp -d 0/0 -j MARK
> --set-mark 2
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth0 -s 0/0 --dport ftp -d 0/0 -j MARK
> --set-mark 2
> iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -p tcp -o eth0 -s 0/0 --dport ftp-data -d 0/0 -j MARK
> --set
Dear All,
I've read the message with the similar subject but I have a different
problem. I've got this network:
INTERNET
|
++
|firewall/nat|
++
| \
..
.1 .2
| \
+--+ +--+
|router| |router|
+--+ +--+
10.0.2.1 10.0.2.3
> You have neither dropped or overlimit packets too. Was traffic really
> limited to the specified rate?
On a 100Mbit network I downloaded at 36kbyte/s. I think it's correct.
> > You make me very disappointed. Wondershaper told me that it is possible.
I
> > just wanted to add a level in the class-
> I'd like to know if packets are dropped with if the 300kbit limit is
> eceeded. If bandwidth isn't limited, there is no need for filters anyway.
> Could you mail me the output of 'tc -s class ls dev eth1' ? Thanks.
Here you are: (i made ssh,ping,ftp traffic)
class htb 1:101 parent 1:100 leaf 101
My simple network sheme:
eth0eth1
internetgw(traffic shaping)---client
I'd like to make this script work on a gateway with more than 100
clients.(ISP's gw)
>
> Since your script looks almost identical to mine, I wonder:
> Does your HTB setup li
Hello,
Even if i use passive transfer? Notice that ping request/ping reply also
don't work. How do you mean that it only works from MY ftp server? How could
i shape ftp traffic from every ftp host? Thanks!
Viktor
> Hello,
>
> The problem is with your FTP filter:
> FTP data are transferred on
class-system
doesn't work the way I think. Do you have any idea where did I make the
mistake? (of course I want to add much more classes later but it's just the
test phase) Thank you in advance!
Kertész Viktor
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PRO
12 matches
Mail list logo
