efault via $PTP1 dev src $IP1 proto static
table
ip route add default via $PTP2 dev src $IP2 proto static
table
(Proto static needs kernel patches, but you don't really need this)
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
for selection proper (means the same) uplink
device under respect of uplink device from control connection. But so
far there is no patch i know about.
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
look at table 100 for routing
entries.
ip rule add prio $PRIO fwmark 0x01 table 100
#insert your routing entries for alle marked packets into table 100
ip route add <...> table 100
...
$IP must changed according your setup.
the $PRIO must be changed to take at the right place. If i understa
T
you must mark your traffic in FORWARD or POSTROUTING chain. OUTPUT is
only for locally generated traffic.
--
Markus Schulz
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where
the shadows lie." --
Am Freitag, 3. März 2006 02:54 schrieb Russell Stuart:
> On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 02:23 +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
> > The second rate table is 100% equivalent to realtime calc. But the
> > static version differs for some ip-length values from it. And i
> > don't understan
Am Donnerstag, 2. März 2006 23:18 schrieb Russell Stuart:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:51 +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
> > > Why you don't use the existing overhead parameter? It's useless
> > > to have two parameters which do the exact same thing (existing
> >
e
static version differs for some ip-length values from it. And i don't
understand why.
Perhaps someone can point me to the difference?
The program is only for testing rate tables calculations.
It would be nice to do it without a htb or other qdisc module patch. And
i think it should be poss
Am Donnerstag, 2. März 2006 14:37 schrieb Markus Schulz:
> Am Donnerstag, 2. März 2006 08:30 schrieb Russell Stuart:
> > I have been trying to optimise my ADSL connections for VOIP.
> > Funny things were happening - for example increasing the ping
> > packet size by 50% ha
st be added to rate table calculation.
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
hes here:
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes
please read the guides (nano howto or dgd-usage) carefully.
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
look at http://www.linuxguruz.com/iptables/howto/2.4routing-11.html
and please, don't send html mails to mailing lists.
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 14:45 schrieb Markus Schulz:
> tc -s -d class show dev ppp0
> class htb 1:1 root rate 576000bit ceil 576000bit burst 30Kb/8 mpu 0b
> overhead 0b cburst 1739b/8 mpu 0b overhead 14b level 7
> Sent 1485575598 bytes 3140554 pkts (dropped 0, overlimit
: why "tc show class" prints the overhead and mpu value
twice? And why is the first overhead value = 0?
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
arent : protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip \
src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNSTREAM}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1
This works fine, shapes all traffic down to $DOWNSTREAM limit.
--
Markus Schulz
> >Is that verb regular? Does "ich kann den Mond spre
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 14:23, Sophana Kok wrote:
> Markus Schulz wrote:
> >On Wednesday 16 November 2005 16:03, Andy Furniss wrote:
> >>I use something similar and use ceil 286kbit while synced at
> >> 288kbit without problems.
>
> What thing similar do you
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 16:03, Andy Furniss wrote:
> sophana wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm using wondershaper like script. But noticed imperfect
> > scheduling.
> >
> > By googling, I found some patches that takes the aal5 atm overhead
> > in the scheduling algorithms.
> > http://www.adsl-optimiz
with ip_conntrack_ftp module or
similar?
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 14:56 schrieb Markus Schulz:
> Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 09:33 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
> > Thanks for the link!
> >
> > At the beginning of the document it states that it will not work
> > with two modem connections. What if both my ADSL lin
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 13:04 schrieb Paulo Andre:
> Markus Schulz wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 12:39 schrieb Paulo Andre:
> >>Markus Schulz wrote:
> >>>Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 16:05 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
> >>>>Hi guys;
> >>>
&
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 12:39 schrieb Paulo Andre:
> Markus Schulz wrote:
> > Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 16:05 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
> >>Hi guys;
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>Here's what I want to know:
> >>1. Does an updated guide exi
i can post my script.
> Also, is patching the kernel necessary? (FC2, kernel version 2.6.5)
i think yes, but i didn't tried it without.
i've tried only the variant with only one multipath default route (without the
two additional tables for each device as mentioned in the nano howto) and
rnel 2.6.11.8)
system with two adsl 3mbit/512kbit devices and it works fine.
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2005 18:55 schrieb Markus Schulz:
> Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 23:07 schrieb Jason Boxman:
> > On Friday 06 May 2005 05:50, Vinod Chandran wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have implemented QOS classifiers using TC with HTB. The
> > > cla
ropped 0, overlimits 0)
lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
tokens: 95869 ctokens: 31485
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
24 matches
Mail list logo
