> There's also SNMP extensions for QoS.
>
> http://x-ray.prokon.cz/data/snmp/downloads/
>
Has anyone tried this on a 2.6 kernel? I talked with Michal Charvat, the
author of the QoS SNMP extensions and he has not looked at the 2.6 kernel
but fears that is where the problem lies. Any ideas??
-
lps someone.
--Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael S. Kazmier
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 2:33 PM
> To: 'lartc mailing list'
> Subject: RE: [LARTC] Help! VLAN tagged traffic not shaping :-
> My linux box has 2 interfaces (eth0 and eth1). These are bridged to form
> br0.
> All web/email traffic is sent to IMQ (via netfilter) and shaped.
>
> The VLAN traffic just has a 4-byte 802.1Q header between the ethernet
> header and
> the IP header (which is stripped off by br_netfilter.c so ip
Hello all,
I am having some trouble getting a firewall filter to work with TC. I am
actually setting the mark via EBTables (which is working as far as I can
tell, I am also logging the packet and my syslog reports lots of marks):
ebtables -t broute -A BROUTING -p ipv4 -i eth1 -s 08:00:46:60:B3:
Hello Alex,
Perhaps I missed something below which ties eth0 and eth1 to the PPP pipe,
or its just my unfamiliarity with PPP.
Regardless, an interesting methodology. Do you think you could do the
following:
--
The reason I ask is that I would like to, at the PPP level, apply CBQ o
Hello all,
I have been doing a lot of archive searching over the last week reading
posts on IMQ and it's apparent stability / instability. I have seen a
number of posts about it not being maintained as well. Can anyone talk to
me about IMQ's stability in a heavy throughput environment (20 Mbps)
Hello all,
I am trying to figure out a way to traffic shape for QoS (ie, prioritize
different types of traffic) for an entire network and ALSO rate limit /
shape individual users on this network.
Now, I understand it all for rate control on users - what I can't figure out
is how we can shape /
