On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 19:24 +0100, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
> Dnia środa, 13 grudnia 2006 18:55, Arik Raffael Funke napisał(a):
>
> > But the command given at the beginning does not work. It give in dmesg:
> > ip_tables: ipp2p match: invalid size 0 != 8
>
> I had same problems when I had too
such as FTP slower then interactive (SSH)
activities so not to feel the lag.
--
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!!
Neuromancer 12:16:40 up 8 days, 18:28, 5 users, load average: 0.42,
0.30, 0.26
___
LART
e not routed correctly.
hence they can't go on the net.
--
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!!
Neuromancer 12:15:11 up 8 days, 18:27, 5 users, load average: 0.32,
0.24, 0.24
___
LARTC mailing list
LA
eded packets and dropping it at the gateway/router
etc and hence losing bandwidth.
AFAICT, TCP's built in window scaling just moves it up each time it gets
a successful transmit, but when it drops, it will have to restart itself
say, from zero.
That's my uderstanding. May be flawed.
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 15:20 +0800, Grace Baldonasa wrote:
> HI all,
>
> Im kind of new to this Bandwidth Management thing. I want to ask if
> this is the right mailing list for me to ask questions regarding TC
> for bandwidth shapping?
> Thanks.
Yep..
--
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/
ontent with priotising ACKs so that web-requests ACKs will
still get through faster.
Hmm.. didn't BRam Cohen come out with BT 4.0 which is supposed to mark
BT packets as "BULK"?
> Ed W
--
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!!
Neuromancer 15:43:1
SO dl's
through Bittorrent.
Why delay Acks?? Just because you want to delay/make/simulate the normal
TCP behaviour of making the window smaller??
(unless of course if you can make "Specific" Windows smaller. (i would
think this would be useful only if we can tag acks for Bulk
: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src
0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1
--
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on D600 1.4Ghz
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!!
Neuromancer 10:46:57 up 1:40, 5 users, 0.18, 0.33, 0.36
___
LARTC mailing
t a FC3 on P133 w/128MB ram on 2.6.9 and
running TC w/ bittorrent shaping w/ wondershaper & shorewall
integration.
I have a howto somewhere on the net. tell me if you're interested.
--
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on D600 1.4Ghz
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!!
Neuromancer 14:14:53 up 5:04, 6 users,
On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 16:13, Craig Main wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Craig Main <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 16:57:00 +0200
> Subject: Alternatives to Squid
> To: Gentoo User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have an internet cafe connected on a
your needs. (correct me if I'm wrong of more info
please).
Say.. If you limit 50Kb/s for _all_ users, then it will be equally
shared between _all_ users.
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive
Neuromancer 09:40:50 up 34 min, 9 users, load averag
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 00:03, EC wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to do the following with lartc tools :
> I would like to limit any entering user to not use more than Xkb/mb to my
> website. The IPs they use are changing all the time so static IP limitation
> cannot be used. Is there a way doing so
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 11:31, Jeffrey Schaper wrote:
> Where can I find examples of configs to emulate WANs, I am looking for
> slow speeds and high latencies.
I am interested as well. How else can one determine if the script is
working??
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4G
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 02:10, Zviad O. Giorgadze wrote:
> According to tc-htb man page, if we set PRIO parameter, then after
> supplying the packets to satisfy the RATE of all classes, the HTB
> first sends the available packets to LOWEST PRIO class and so on.
I think that's correct
> In this case
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 03:36, John Zavgren wrote:
> Is there a port of this code availble for testing purposes?
Wht software? What code? What Testing?
tc is already available. I'm using it.
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive
Neurom
ms either..
Please go to http://nyc.speakeasy.net/ and test your upload and download speeds
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive
Neuromancer 11:01:52 up 1:45, 10 users, load average: 0.91, 0.89, 0.83
__
ms either..
Please go to http://nyc.speakeasy.net/ and test your upload and download speeds
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive
Neuromancer 11:01:52 up 1:45, 10 users, load average: 0.91, 0.89, 0.83
__
angle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -m mark --mark 0 -j MARK --set-mark 26
[SNIP]
Can you determine what ports are being used for inbound data transfers?
What makes you select those ports you defined as the outbound??
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive
N
io 0 protocol ip handle 20 fw flowid 1:20
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle 26 fw flowid 1:26
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive
Neuromancer 10:50:12 up 1:29, 5 users, load average: 0.23, 0.42, 0.51
d me the script and I'll have a whack at it.
You can see how I've implemented it here.
http://my-opensource.org/howto/qostrafficshaping-shorewall-wondershaper-howto.html
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive
Neuromancer
inst the FWmarks
or in your case sport . (Though I've never did that successfully. I
prefer fwmarks)
* Is it a "prio" question ?
Not sure.
Check this out. See if it helps you.
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-July/msg01764.html
http://my-opensource.org/howto/qostraffic
configuration issue?Any idea?
Thanks in advance,
Aravind.
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive
Neuromancer 13:46:30 up 4:53, 4 users, load average: 1.64, 1.64, 1.50
___
LARTC mailing list
scussion was in
http://my-opensource.org/lists/myoss/2004-07/msg00051.html
http://my-opensource.org/lists/myoss/2004-06/msg00167.html
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-July/msg01492.html
Thanks
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.j
23 matches
Mail list logo