On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 08:37:11PM +0530, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> It is actually easy. The LARTC How To does not take care of failover
> but load balancing works fine. So if you want just load balancing you
> can go with it. You can also try out any of the following approaches /
> scripts:
Tha
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:52:32PM +0530, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> You can try out implementing configuring a load balancing and failover
> system referring to the following documents:
>
> http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt
> http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/dgd-usage.txt
Sigh I thought it must be very
Hi,
A friend of mine has 2 lines of 512kbps terminated in two Linux boxes.
He now want to remove those 2 boxes and have some device which will
loadbalance the two ISPs and also have a failover arrangement. But he
has agreed to give me a chance to do it on Linux for my own
satisfication.
Is thi
Hi,
This is the 7th time I am reading lartc.org howto and now got the reason
why I could't understand it for so many days.
It starts real good with cool basics, but on Chapter 4 "Rules - routing
policy database" it gets complicated very fast.
e.g. it mentions /etc/iproute2/rt_tables file but doe
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:42:06PM +0100, Andreas Unterkircher wrote:
> I had such a experience with SuSE on a server with two network
> interface. While only one of them was
> connected to the lan with a fixed IP, the other was configured by YaST
> to get it's IP from a DHCP server.
I too am on
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:50:34PM -0500, Brett Charbeneau wrote:
> http://www.cas.ilstu.edu/shac/Knowledge/Spam/iana.htm
>
> see the "Autoconfiguration" IP Addresses section.
Yes, I read it, thnaks but I don't understand it.
| Addresses in the range 169.254.0.0 to 169.254.255.255 are used
Hi,
I have 2 interfaces - one for adsl and other for LAN on my Linux gateway
machine. The IP addresses are 10.10.10.3 & 192.168.10.101 respectively.
Now my routing tables show this particular entry. What exactly is this?
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link
Or by traditional route -n,
169.254.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:12:03PM -0500, Brett Charbeneau wrote:
> Does that make your pppoe interface ppp0? Try issuing an
> "ifconfig" command to see. I'm always confused about how the
> kernel sees a pppoe interface.
Yes, my ISP assigned IP is given to ppp0
With warm regard
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:09:18AM -0500, Brett Charbeneau wrote:
> tc qdisc delete dev eth0 root
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf limit 5kb burst 5kb rate 256kbit
>
> tc qdisc delete dev eth1 root
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 root tbf limit 5kb burst 5kb rate 256kbit
I have adsl (pppoe) with eth0 as
Hi,
My branch office as got a 256Kbps b/w from their service provider at a
very very high rate per Mb. They don't require 256Kbps at all but the
ISP does not offer anything low. Can we restrict the bandwith to say
64Kbps nothing fancy? How do I go about it?
With warm regards,
-Payal
Hi,
Even after many tries I am not able to get lartc at all. So, I am
starting fresh again. Can someone tell can I use lartc on a single
machine and see it working? Where do I start from exactly? I am getting
more and more confused.
With warm regards,
-Payal
___
Hello,
I am trying wondershaper-1.1a on a friend's pppoe connection on her
Linux box.
There are a few things I don't understand.
1. She has pppoe connection so should DEV=eth0 or DEV=ppp0 ?
2. Her ISP just says on her payment bill that the speed is 128kbps, but
doesn't mention any downlink/uplink
Hi,
The other day I went to my friend's company where her local LAN IP
was 37.0.0.8 I was pretty shocked since that IP is not for internal
use. So, I asked her system admin about it and he muttered something
about classless IP range and went off. Was he right in giving such a
range to internal
Hi,
I am taking my machine loaded with Mandrake 10.0 and Suse 9.1 to my
friend's place. She has 2 different ISP providing pppoe connections
in her office. She has allowed me try load balancing on my machine on
Sunday. I just wanted to know does lartc stand good with pppoe? I
have heard conflict
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:30:48AM -0800, Jonathan Day wrote:
> Is packet forwarding enabled on the box you're using
> as a gateway?
Ofcourse, because if I delete the default route using route command
and add 192.168.0.4 as default route I can reach the internet.
-Payal
_
Hi,
I have Mandrake 10.0 gateway with internet via. ppp0. Also, another
machine 192.168.0.4 is always connected to net via. a dial-up
modem. Now I want to allow a machine (192.168.0.2) in my LAN to
access net through 192.168.0.4. So according to lartc howto I did,
# echo 200 John >> /etc/iproute2/r
Hi,
A majority of our work inolves ftp to my clients' side over our
slow connection. Now we need to allocate a greater b/w for this
protocol. Is there anyway I can do it using lartc easily?
Any suggestions on this please?
With warm regards,
-Payal
___
L
Hi,
I have Mandrake 10.0 (official). I have read the section in lartc about
"Routing for multiple uplinks/providers", but still I have some queries
below.
I have a DSL connection where they give pppoe which is directly terminated
into eth1 of my Linux box. Now I have another machine connected to d
Hi,
I have a small routing query again. Same question but asking in simple
language.
Can I use,
route add -net default gw 192.168.10.1
route add -net default gw 192.168.10.2
Where 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.2 are internal IPs of two different
ISPs routers.
And assume that random routing is ena
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:18:23PM +0530, Vadiraj C S wrote:
> > Is it possible to use more than one default route? I believe yes.
> > Any comments on them. If I use more than one, where will the trafficc be
> > diverted from?
>
> Yes you can, the traffic gets balanced between two routes...
Ok.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 04:29:25PM +1000, Damion de Soto wrote:
> >Is it possible to use more than one default route? I believe yes.
> >Any comments on them. If I use more than one, where will the trafficc be
> >diverted from?
> That's a good question. I was going to answer your other post, but d
Hi,
Is it possible to use more than one default route? I believe yes.
Any comments on them. If I use more than one, where will the trafficc be
diverted from?
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles visit:
http://payal.staticky.com
___
Hi,
This is just a hypothetical case (now) to get my basics cleared.
If I have 2 different service providers A and B which provides me bandwidth.
They terminate their lines on their two separate routers. So, one end of
router has a external ip and the end connected to a switch in my LAN
has an inte
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 07:27:08AM +0530, Venkatesh. K wrote:
> I am sorry for the goof up in my earlier mail.
>
> As suggested earlier, using router to count traffic is best way to go. If
> you have a router which can't provide the accounting, you can consider
> using a netflow probe.
But what i
Hi,
When the webhosting comanies say that they give you say 10Mb webspace
and 200Mb data transfer per month, how do they count data tranfer for
that domain?
I am unable to figure it out.
With warm regards,
-Payal
p.s. hope this is not too OT here.
--
For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles v
rfaces (eth0 or eth1)?
All machines are 125.125.125.0/24. They are either connected t eth0 r
eth1.
HTH,
-Payal
> On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 22:33, Payal Rathod wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a simple question. I asked a friend about it but he was also not
> > clear. So, I thought of mail
Hi,
I have a simple question. I asked a friend about it but he was also not
clear. So, I thought of mailing the list.
I have a linux box (RH 7.2) which will have 2 net cards. I have 2 types
of connections to that box. One RF at eth0 and 1 ISDN at eth1.
Now I told 10 people from the company to give
27 matches
Mail list logo
