[LARTC] Patch for Increasing Routing tables in Fedora Core 3 ( Kernel 2.6 )

2006-11-08 Thread Vendra, Hari Prasad V V P CH S H (Prasad)
Hi, Is there any patch available for increasing routing tables from 256 to higher number for Fedora Core 3 and above. Regards, Prasad. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] IPSec tunnel mode, through a IPIP tunnel

2006-07-26 Thread Prasad
small info to add: I am using a 2.4 kernel (RH-9) and the packets currently are going through IPSec, then getting routed through eth0 directly (but I want them to go through tunl0) Prasad Prasad wrote: Hello Gurus, I am a small problem with routing and here are the details. Interfaces

[LARTC] IPSec tunnel mode, through a IPIP tunnel

2006-07-25 Thread Prasad
172.19.58.200 dev tunl0 Well, all this assumes that once the packet enters the ipsec tunnel, after encapsulation the packets are routed afresh based on the routing tables. Could the gurus help me fix this!!! Thanks, Prasad ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC

[LARTC] re-routing network traffic.

2006-07-10 Thread Prasad
, if destination is 10.10.10.2 and the packet is not marked, mark it. 3. Create another route for the packets that are marked. Is this approach the right one, and is it possible to do such a thing - I am specially doubtful about the second step!! Thanks, Prasad

[LARTC] multiple tunnelling problem

2006-06-27 Thread Prasad
with destination as 10.10.10.40 (after encapsulation). The resulting packet should now be routed through another device created by my Mobile IP Driver. Is it possible to have such a routing table? If yes, how do I achieve this? Thanks, Prasad ___ LARTC mailing

Re: [LARTC] multiple tunnelling problem

2006-06-27 Thread Prasad
Prasad wrote: Hello all, I have a problem with one of my routing requirements when using IPSec along with a proprietary Mobile IP implementation. And sorry for such a long mail :( Here is a brief description of my situation: My client (mobile-node) has an IP address of 10.10.10.40, my

[LARTC] Question on Routing Tables

2005-10-09 Thread Vendra, Hari Prasad V V P CH S H (Hari V)
Hi, I am using Fedora Core 3 kernel 2.6.9.The max limit on routing tables is 255(5 of them are reserved ,0,1,253,254,255 ).I am using iproute2 utility for managing routes.I want to increase the max limit of routing tables to 1000(min.).Is there some solution for it? Or some patch available?

[LARTC] Count no of hosts

2003-02-06 Thread CLS Prasad
Is there any way to dynamically measure the no of concurrent internal hosts (IP's) utilising the linux NAT Gateway/forwarding box. The idea is to measure the no of hosts actively using the gateway. I do not want to measure the no of TCP connections which iptraf does because it does not give the

[LARTC] Which Queue

2002-10-10 Thread CLS Prasad
This is my approx network ISP--Router-masq/firewall/tc machineCore/access switches-1500 Lan users On the tc machine I want to limit each users overall download bandwidth to say 20 Kbps, irrespective of however many TCP sessions he has opened up. 1.What classes/queues should