Re: [LARTC] management of virus and p2p-traffic

2004-06-22 Thread Ralf Staudemeyer
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 12:01, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > Ralf Staudemeyer wrote: > > >On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 07:20, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > > > > > > > >>The other stuff is easily possible, but for the number of users that you > >>have you are going to n

Re: [LARTC] management of virus and p2p-traffic

2004-06-22 Thread Ralf Staudemeyer
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 07:20, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > The other stuff is easily possible, but for the number of users that you > have you are going to need to invest some time to write some scripts to > handle mapping users to MAC addresses and make the whole thing > maintainable. There was anoth

Re: [LARTC] management of virus and p2p-traffic

2004-06-22 Thread Ralf Staudemeyer
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 17:06, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > >The Windows machines with their viruses give me a > >headache. I do not want to enforce remote Windows patching and > >virusscanner updating. It should also be taken into account that there > >is nearly no money available for any special equipment

[LARTC] management of virus and p2p-traffic

2004-06-21 Thread Ralf Staudemeyer
Hi I have to manage a network with approx. 200 users, a 256kbit/s unmanaged Internet connection and a 3Mbit/s unreliable managed Internet connection (only http/ftp-proxy and ssh available). All users are in one Class C Subnet with 512 IP-Addresses. 60% of the machines are Windows. The rest are SUN