[LARTC] TC on virtual NIC, and how to manage the incoming traffic

Hello list, i thank you for the precious info you gave me, they were really useful in my work. I need to work with TC on a virtual interface. Is it possible ? How ? There is any doc on this topic ? And foremost, is my idea of working with TC on a virtual interface viable ? I am wondering if to

Re: [LARTC] How to explde HTB.INIT tc commands?

2006/6/4, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Stefano Mainardi wrote: Hi to all, [...] You already sent that mail three times in less than 30 hours. Please stop. I know, is a error of my SMTP. Somebody will answer if he/she knows. I know too. htb.init compile, i've found

[LARTC] TC on virtual NIC, and how to manage the incoming traffic

if to control the traffic which comes in on a specific inferface is better to use TC's filter or mark the packets with the MANGLE TABLE of IProute ? Or something different at all ?Thanks to anyone will respond! -- Stefano Mainardi ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC

[LARTC] How to explode tc rules maked by HTB.init?

Hi to all, i'm using htb.init for configuring my shaper. Now i want to know if it possible to show how htb.init make and use TC, anyone has tried it? Many thanks. -- Stefano Mainardi Presidente Associazione ILDN - Italian Linux Distro Network Mobile: 349/3917212 Skype: mainardistefano IM (ICQ

[LARTC] How to explde HTB.INIT tc commands?

Hi to all, i'm using htb.init for configuring my shaper. Now i want to know if it possible to show how htb.init make and use TC, anyone has tried it? Many thanks.-- Stefano MainardiPresidente Associazione ILDN - Italian Linux Distro NetworkMobile: 349/3917212Skype: mainardistefanoIM (ICQ):

Re: [LARTC] Re: For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ?

2006/6/2, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Stefano Mainardi wrote: Hi to all, i'm following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is very detailed, but i'm a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of leaf classes. In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached

[LARTC] For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ?

Hi to all,i'm following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is very detailed, but i'm a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of leaf classes. In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached at message) in this way: # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle

[LARTC] For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ?

handle 220: sfq preturb 10 # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:23 handle 230: sfq preturb 10 . . . What's the real difference? Best Regards -- Stefano Mainardi Presidente Associazione ILDN - Italian Linux Distro Network Mobile: 349/3917212 Skype: mainardistefano IM (ICQ): 250-292-408 Blog: http

Re: Fwd: [LARTC] HTB shaping borrowing info

Hi Andy,how i must setup the value for CBURST for my situation? Have you read?Ste2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] :Stefano Mainardi wrote: tc class add dev eth1 parent 11:1 classid 11:2 htb rate 70Mbit ceil 70Mbit burst 6k cburst 64k quantum 1600I am not sure if it matters in this case

Re: Fwd: [LARTC] HTB shaping borrowing info

Ok, i try without CBURST value.Thanks ;)2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Stefano Mainardi wrote: Hi Andy, how i must setup the value for CBURST for my situation? Have you read?I think the burst is too small - In your case I would just not specifyeither burst and let htb choose them. Andy

Re: Fwd: [LARTC] HTB shaping borrowing info

Ops BURST...sorry!And CBURST value you think that is correct?2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Stefano Mainardi wrote: Ok, i try without CBURST value.Without burst aswell ... Andy.-- Stefano MainardiPresidente Associazione ILDN - Italian Linux Distro NetworkMobile: 349/3917212Skype

Re: Fwd: [LARTC] HTB shaping borrowing info

Andreas,if I want that A,B,C can borrow bandwidth from each other? How i can the structure of HTB tree?Stefano2006/5/28, Andreas Klauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:04:57AM +0200, Stefano Mainardi wrote: Like I said above, in the case that B is not producing traffic, 7/8

Fwd: [LARTC] HTB shaping borrowing info

2006/5/27, Andreas Klauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If B don't make traffic, 7/8 of 20Mb/s must be assigned to A and all the rest at BWhy would you assign traffic at B if it doesn't make traffic?Sorry, all the rest at A :) Post your HTB script and I (and probably others) will have a look at it. This

Re: Fwd: [LARTC] HTB shaping borrowing info

2006/5/28, Andreas Klauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So, in other words, A is allowed to take bandwidth from B.B and C stick to their bandwidth limits.There is a misunderstanding, sorry.I need to know if it is possible to manage in a dynamic way the assignment of traffic to workstations and of the traffic