Re: [LARTC] HTB + BRIDGEQUESTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!

2003-07-17 Thread Trevor Warren
Hello, Change the ceil parameter to suit the maximum value of bandwidth on that link. Check and get back to us. Trevor On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 06:28, tanxuey wrote: > Hi everybody! > > I am very glad to get htb test information from www.docum.org for the > htb performance. > > Today, I setup

Re: [LARTC] Problen in cbq , fw

2003-07-16 Thread Trevor Warren
Pawanji, Aapka yeh config tho thik hai. This config seems to be perfectly fine, why don't you try htb + u32 and see the comparitive results you get. This isn't a solution to your problem though. Setting up the same is a breeze and it does the job more than well. Trevor On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 1

Re: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate

2003-07-14 Thread Trevor Warren
Hey pal, What about the overhead part to create the display that flows between the internet gateway(Machine you are monitoring) and your machine???. Trevor On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 14:35, Rajesh Srivastava wrote: > I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics > reporting. > > I

Re: [LARTC] Wondershaper working, but not quite as expected

2003-07-12 Thread Trevor Warren
Michael, Maybe we can help you out much better if you could space out the sentences below. They seem to be a jigsaw puzzle. Trevor On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 20:12, Michael Frotscher wrote: > Hello, LARTC-List > > I try to get my traffic-shaping done with Wondershaper 1.1a. When I run > the script

[LARTC] Can you host the htb + u32 scripts pls

2003-07-07 Thread Trevor Warren
Hell Stef..Martin, I would love it if others could use the final scripts sent across yesterday i have done using htb + u32 as a benchmark. It incorporates a lot of input from you all and a large amount of r and d to achieve the simple but high performance configuration. Lemme know...;) Trev

Re: [LARTC] HTB_debug_dump: is annoying :) [Pach included]

2003-07-04 Thread Trevor Warren
Sorry Mike, This isn't an answer to your queries but instead a question. I would like to know if there are any added fields to the tc -s -d output post application of the 2.5 kernel patch you have applied below. Cause i am using htb with 2.4.21 and there isn't much of graphing i can do with the

[LARTC] Re: some can help out with u32 & TBF limitation < 2048 only

2003-07-03 Thread Trevor Warren
sh > tables ... > > I hope I didn't make mistake in my ideas - maybe Alexey > will correct it. > > --- > Martin Devera aka devik > Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/ > > On 2 Jul 2003, Trev

Re: [LARTC] Re: some can help out with u32 & TBF limitation < 2048only

2003-07-03 Thread Trevor Warren
time you could change it and use 1 HTB class and 3000 u32 > filters pointing to the same class - the we will know where the > limit is. > > --- > Martin Devera aka devik > Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/ > >

Re: [LARTC] pushin htb + tc to the limits....kernel oops

2003-06-29 Thread Trevor Warren
Hello Martin...Stef, I am using tc from the download you provide but iproute2 that comes with RH. Thus i doub't therez an issue with my setup. Lemme know where according to you the issue is. Am unable to fathom the source of the filter issue. If you desire any clarifications please lemme know.

Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???

2003-06-29 Thread Trevor Warren
nt machine). > > > The errors were gone after I recompiled tc from the same sources > > > on the machine where it's being used. Could be some libraries > > > incompatibilities or changes made to some header files. > > > So look at the script if you&#x

Re: [LARTC] Cant restrict netmeeting traffic

2003-06-29 Thread Trevor Warren
Think what you need is IMQ for shaping incoming+outgoing traffic. Trevor On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 16:40, Joel wrote: > Hello All Linux gurus, > > From 3 days i m trying to restrict Netmeeting traffic. > > I have restricted the bandwidth to 30kbit per ip. but the machine with > netmeeting. means

Re: [LARTC] IMQ Sample Script or HTB sample script

2003-06-26 Thread Trevor Warren
Hey...;) Can you please look through this months archives. Me and a lot of others have put up some scripts that will work for you. Trevor On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 02:11, Chijioke Kalu wrote: > I know I shld read the docs properly but am still having a problem tailoring > it to suite my needs. I

Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???

2003-06-26 Thread Trevor Warren
ript if you're interested. > > Michael > > p.s. I'm not sure that larts list manager will allow attachment through. > If it doesn't and you want the script - email me. > > > On Tuesday 24 June 2003 06:13 pm, Trevor Warren wrote: > > Hello, > > >

Re: [LARTC] Your script.....U32 limitation....;)

2003-06-25 Thread Trevor Warren
Hey...;) So thenwhere is the limitation. What is causing this limit of filters. How does one scale with U32 and HTB. Is it cause the bandwidth mentioned in the lower classes is more than the root class. Trevor On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 10:11, Giannis Stoilis wrote: > Your script produce

Re: [LARTC] 1 MBS per server Linux router

2003-06-25 Thread Trevor Warren
s ) { sfq; } ; > } > } > } > } > > > I have plugged my machine behind the router but I see no difference when > I download :-( > > What is wrong with that script? > > If this is not working, I'll try wrr. > > Thanks! >

Re: [LARTC] 1 MBS per server Linux router

2003-06-25 Thread Trevor Warren
Hello, If you just wanna reduce the b/w pipe per server wrr could be a simplistic implementation that would work. For real functionality see htb which works like a charm. For something more complex see cbq. Trevor On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 21:47, Jean-Francois Levesque wrote: > Hello everyone! >

Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???

2003-06-25 Thread Trevor Warren
o you, but trust me that are > 5 filters. > > Try to use hashes to reduce the kernel pressure. > > > > > Trevor > > > > > > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:49, Catalin BOIE wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Trevor Warren wrote: > > > > &

Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???

2003-06-25 Thread Trevor Warren
ce the kernel pressure. > > > > > Trevor > > > > > > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:49, Catalin BOIE wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Trevor Warren wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Can some one please confirm which would be the be

[LARTC] u32 clarification

2003-06-24 Thread Trevor Warren
Can some one please confirm which would be the best place to clarify these U32 issues and 2048 U32 filter limitations as i had posted in my previous mail. Trevor -- ( >-GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\__[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ /~\ | \) / Pre Sales Consultant

Re: [LARTC] u32 filter limits?? ....?2000

2003-06-23 Thread Trevor Warren
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:41, Trevor Warren wrote: > Hey Nickola, > > Yep, this surely is a feature/bug of tc which deems clarification. Hope > someone can come around with a fix for the same. > > As for your setup, can i humbly request you to send across the script > suc

Re: [LARTC] bandwidth limiting incoming data

2003-06-23 Thread Trevor Warren
Hello Sreram, AFAIK all Traffic Shaping be it Ingress/Egress can be done at your end. This will help majorly on the link at your end by prioritising trafic appropriately. You can't possibly change traffic priorities at your isps end. Trevor On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 17:38, K S Sreeram wrote: >

Re: [LARTC] looking for bridging/filtering info

2003-06-22 Thread Trevor Warren
Hello There, You are looking in the wrong place dear. RTFM iptables howto. The url for the same would be www.tldp.org. Trevor On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 04:04, D. Stimits wrote: > I'm using a linux bridge with ipchains (will be setting up some shaping > in the near future), and looking for any cur

Re: [LARTC] u32 filter limits?? ....?2000

2003-06-22 Thread Trevor Warren
Hey Nickola, Yep, this surely is a feature/bug of tc which deems clarification. Hope someone can come around with a fix for the same. As for your setup, can i humbly request you to send across the script such that i can test the same on my setup.that is if you don't mind. Also, i was under

[LARTC] pushin htb + tc to the limits....kernel oops

2003-06-22 Thread Trevor Warren
Hello Folks..;) Was testing out some practical issues of having 2000-4000 Classes and filters for htb. My testbed for the same is my laptop. * My Dell Lattitude runs RH 9.0 * 2.4.21 Stock kernel from kernel.org Guess this one is a little bit more than queer than the other for the following r

RE: [LARTC] HOW TO COMBINE 2 DSL LINES IN THE SAME COMPUTER

2003-06-20 Thread Trevor Warren
t; > > However that assumes the cable is connected to the linux box. In my > >case, > > > internet connections are on windows box since DSL modem has no linux > >driver > > > and linux is not supported by my ISP. > > > > > > I would appreciate

Re: [LARTC] Paquet pading problem using HTB+SFQ

2003-06-20 Thread Trevor Warren
Try removing the SFQ. Trevor On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 13:54, Olivier DOURNAUX (DSI NOISIEL) wrote: > Hi, > > I have set up QoS using HTB to identify classes and SFQ to > order all classes traffic. > > It work fine but sometime "strange" paquets are sent... They > contains correct data but header

Re: [LARTC] RTNETLINK answers: invalid argument

2003-06-20 Thread Trevor Warren
Hello Ana, There could me multiple reasons for the same. Try shortlisting the same from here for a start. * Is your kernel patched with htb support * Upgraded to 2.4.20> preferably 2.4.21 which has wonderful support for HTB inbuilt. * Does your version of tc support the same. * If not google for

RE: [LARTC] HOW TO COMBINE 2 DSL LINES IN THE SAME COMPUTER

2003-06-20 Thread Trevor Warren
Hey pals...;) RTFM. Check the LARTC HOWTO on the following points: 4. Rules - routing policy database 4.1. Simple source policy routing 4.2. Routing for multiple uplinks/providers 4.2.1. Split access 4.2.2. Load balancing

RE: [LARTC] herz the script that i have done.

2003-06-19 Thread Trevor Warren
plorer like interface. I've the idea. If you are open, I can feed you > the same. > > Mohan > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Stef Coene > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:52 PM > To: Trevor Warren > Cc: lartc

Re: [LARTC] herz the script that i have done.

2003-06-17 Thread Trevor Warren
Giannis, What does the script look like. How many different levels/classes have you broken them into???. Trevor On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 17:51, Giannis Stoilis wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Trevor Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Giannis Stoil

Re: [LARTC] herz the script that i have done.

2003-06-16 Thread Trevor Warren
of yours brewing...;) Trevor On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 15:22, Stef Coene wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 22:46, Trevor Warren wrote: > > Stef, > > > > Am setting the same up on my machine now. Want to understand how your > > code works. Getting support for cbq will be the next thing

Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-16 Thread Trevor Warren
Stef, Can cbq/htb support classes for 1000> clients concurrently??. Trevor On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 13:20, Stef Coene wrote: > On Monday 16 June 2003 09:29, Joachim Wickman wrote: > > Thanks for the answer. > > > > How many classes can HTB take? > > I use 4-6 interfaces / computer and 2 pools / i

Re: [LARTC] herz the script that i have done.

2003-06-16 Thread Trevor Warren
aping-Bandwidth Management to be gpl'ed. Trevor On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 13:52, Stef Coene wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 21:49, Trevor Warren wrote: > > Hello Stef, > > > > thanks for the pointers. Think next time i should think before i leap. > > Am setting up your web

Re: [LARTC] herz the script that i have done.

2003-06-16 Thread Trevor Warren
Hello Stef, thanks for the pointers. Think next time i should think before i leap. Am setting up your web interface. The demo suggests support for HTB hope CBQ is there in it too. Trevor On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 12:58, Stef Coene wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 21:08, Trevor Warren wr

Re: [LARTC] herz the script that i have done.

2003-06-16 Thread Trevor Warren
code will be in. Suggestions for the same would be appreciated stef. Trevor On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 00:29, Stef Coene wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 08:27, Trevor Warren wrote: > > Stef;) > > > > Hats off to you. I am zapped as to how did you figure out the > &

[LARTC] any pointers to rtfm will do 2

2003-06-15 Thread Trevor Warren
specific tc docs talking about what i have in mind stef?? Trevor On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 23:26, Stef Coene wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 01:46, Trevor Warren wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > Having made quite a lot of expensive mistakes i have finally clobbered > > together a

Re: [LARTC] herz the script that i have done.

2003-06-15 Thread Trevor Warren
web access and thus adding/deleting these qdisc's /classes/filters on the fly???. Trevor On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 23:26, Stef Coene wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 01:46, Trevor Warren wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > Having made quite a lot of expensive mistakes i have f

[LARTC] herz the script that i have done.

2003-06-15 Thread Trevor Warren
Hello there, Having made quite a lot of expensive mistakes i have finally clobbered together a script for the users on my network. Have a look at it and please suggest as to how can i limit bandwidth to each ip on this network to about 64Kbits. Trevor -- ( >-GNU/LINUX, It's all about C

Re: [LARTC] can't get cbq to traffic shape

2003-06-12 Thread Trevor Warren
2 classid 1:14 : : : : : : Trevor On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 22:01, Stef Coene wrote: > On Wednesday 11 June 2003 05:20, Trevor Warren wrote: > > Hello Folks, > > > > For a long time i have tried to get Traffic Shaping work for my 500 > > Customer setup, but never succeded. I know i ha

Re: [LARTC] can't get cbq to traffic shape

2003-06-12 Thread Trevor Warren
p dst 192.168.12.0/24 classid 1:3 : : : : #Actual Filters On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 22:01, Stef Coene wrote: > On Wednesday 11 June 2003 05:20, Trevor Warren wrote: > > Hello Folks, > > > > For a lon

[LARTC] can't get cbq to traffic shape

2003-06-11 Thread Trevor Warren
Hello Folks, For a long time i have tried to get Traffic Shaping work for my 500 Customer setup, but never succeded. I know i have made mistakes which i ain't able to point out. I have made a heirarchical setup where in the incoming-outgoing bandwidth is split into 10 different subnets and i ha