Hi Jandre Olivier,
1. although the rate is 32Kbit, the ceil is also 32Kbit; you will get
very close 32Kbit, but no more that 32Kbit.
2. The kernel calculates rate based on the packet size, not payload
length. But your client, calculates rate based on the payload length.
If the traffic pattern is
Hi Adrian Turcu,
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:28:30 +0100, Adrian Turcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I just wonder if someone did any performance tests (speed of processing the
> packets) or maybe could advise about this two scenario:
>
> 1. packets are marked with iptables and proce
Hi John E. Peterson,
Yes. My stupid typo.
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:08:20 -0400, "John E. Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you mean POSTROUTING to PREROUTING? That looked wierd.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wang Jian" <[EMAIL PR
194 has to be routed via eth0 to OpenVPN server IP,
> everything else
> to same Ip has to go via eth1.
I see. So you need policy routing. Change your netfilter rule from
POSTROUTING to POSTROUTING.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wang Jian" <[EMAIL
Hi Andy Furniss,
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:29:56 +0100, Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I read back your post and I think the best solution for you is use HTB +
> > PRIO.
>
> I sort of have htb setup like prio but it's more flexable.
I am glad to hear that :)
> >
> > Let interac
on't think you need to use MARK to do policy routing.
> It's a little overkill.
>
> Do you another suggestion than iptables/MARK?
>
> Regards
>
> Remus
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wang Jian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Hi hiphin,
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:39:40 +0200, "hiphin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wang, hi, little of thinking and listen what I found logical
>
> Q1: Is ppp interface, as only one connection on my real eth0 ?
>
> If answare is YES, then simple SFQ on eth0 is good ?
> ...and main difference
Hi Remus,
It seems that
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -p udp --dport 1194 -j MARK \
--set-mark 0x990
will not take effect. (didn't you typo -A as -D?)
POSTROUTING is looked up after routing decision is made. Because the
default route is dev eth1, the output device is eth1, -o e
Hi hiphin,
You can also look into ESFQ. Corey Hickey releases esfq for 2.6.12-rc1.
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:42:35 +0800, Wang Jian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi hiphin,
>
> It seems that your network link is eth0. Then
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb defa
Hi hiphin,
It seems that your network link is eth0. Then
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 256kbit
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 32kbit ceil
256kbit prio 1
Then you can use tc filter to classify all pp
Hi mail.cat-net.co.yu,
Because ppp traffic is over your real network link, you can control ppp
traffic over that physic device. But I think it have limitation, because
with this way you can't look into the ppp layer and differential
TCP/IP applications encapsulated in ppp layer.
On Wed, 6 Apr 200
Hi Andy Furniss,
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:40:54 +0100, Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Looking forward to your feedback :)
>
> It works OK for me - though I would really need it to be variable rate
> to use really - but as you say it's designed for your needs.
>
> I noticed th
Hi Andy Furniss,
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:23:30 +0100, Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Because this per-flow queue is new, you can add things useful to it.
>
> It does look good :-) I'll test when I get time.
>
The attached is the latest. The last one doesn't sync time: queu
peed vary from 3.4kbps to 28.7kbps. The test last about 10 minutes, and
the speeds don't like to converge.
Maybe the fairness is achived in long run, but it hurts applications
that need bandwidth guarantee.
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:42:21 +0100, Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi Andy Furniss,
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:42:21 +0100, Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wow - I wish I could write that in 2 days :-)
>
I think if you have a deadline, then you can do that :-)
> >
> > The test scenario is like this
> >
> > www server <- [ eth0 eth1 ] -> w
t the quality requirement.
2. We can't enforce bandwidth constraint when flow count is very low;
this often means waste of bandwidth.
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:51:15 +0200, Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wang Jian wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > One of my custo
Hi,
One of my customer needs per flow rate control, so I write one.
The code I post here is not finished, but it seems to work as expected.
The kernel patch is agains kernel 2.6.11, the iproute2 patch is against
iproute2-2.6.11-050314.
I write the code in a hurry to meet deadline. There are ma
17 matches
Mail list logo
