Re: [LARTC] multiple wrr as child of htb

2006-01-23 Thread Alexandru Matei
Thanks all for your answer. I'll see how it will behave in practice and let you know. Thanks again, Alex Peter Surda wrote: Alexandru Matei schrieb: Ok, maybe I was not clear enough. Yes you were :-) What I'm interested in is the order of passing throught filters. WRR has a

Re: [LARTC] multiple wrr as child of htb

2006-01-20 Thread Alexandru Matei
Peter Surda wrote: at.matei schrieb: Hi all, hi Can I use wrr with 8 classes each as leaf for each htb child? Yes, but ESFQ may be better. I had stability problems when using more than 1 WRR per interface, but it is possible that it's fixed now. Furthermore, WRR is designed for lar

[LARTC] hardware requirements

2003-07-11 Thread alexandru matei
Hi, I want to make a dedicated bridging traffic control machine using ebtables and HTB. The requirements will be to shape a 10 Mbit link to 1000 users. Is anyone have experience regarding the needed (estimated) hardware for this (processor/memory/type of network cards) ? Thanks, Alex ___

[LARTC] traffic shaping with ebtables

2003-07-09 Thread alexandru matei
Did anybody succeed to make traffic shaping in&outbound on a bridge (ebtables)? Any pointer to such documentation? Or just an example script? Alex ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lar

[LARTC] traffic controlling strategy

2003-06-24 Thread alexandru matei
Hello all, I have a simple question. Assuming a gateway has two interfaces (eth0 in local network and eth1 in outside network), for traffic controlling/shaping in two directions (inbound&outbound) using a this (dedicated) gateway which is the best strategy: 1/ using default outbound shaping on