) | [ROUTE]
#v|
#IN Mangle OUT Conntrack
#| Filter^ Mangle
#|| NAT (Dst)
#v| Filter
Regards,
Mark.
Have you an idea ?
2007/7/2
?
Regards,
Mark.
Routing table before the tunnel is configured:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# netstat -nr
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
66.1.1.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0
eth0.2
10.1.2.0
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:22 +0200, Christian Benvenuti wrote:
Hi Mark,
Hi,
What exactly are the tokens?
I thought each token allowed the sending of one byte, that tokens are
stored in a bucket that can hold a max of burst tokens, and that this
bucket is filled with tokens at rate
. But forget I said it. According to the man page
pfifo_fast Does not maintain statistics and does not show up in tc qdisc
ls. but I just noticed that it does so it doesn't make a difference.
Regards,
Mark.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http
I don't know if default can point
to a non-leaf class, if you try let me know if it works or not.
HTH,
Mark.
# LAN2 NIC
tc qdisc del dev eth1 root
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit
# my machine
tc class add dev eth1
://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
--
Mark S. Krenz
IT Director
Suso Technology Services, Inc.
http://suso.org/
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
limit. It's a limit directly to itself. Will this
work, or what modifications would need to be made to it? I'm not
really advanced enough in linux, and have not had the time to really try it.
Thanks
Mark
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
.
Regards,
Mark
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of alan
tan
Sent: Thursday, 23 November 2006 10:18 p.m.
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: [LARTC] HTB GUI
Hi,
I have many example of HTB GUI
. All is already well developed, which discussed
discuss
about iproute2 static linked? Please advise!
BR
Mark
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC
Jody - Many thanks for taking the time to reply. It's
greatly helped my understanding.
From: Jody Shumaker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 December 2005
19:14To: Mark LidstoneSubject: Re: [LARTC] HTB - prio and
rate
No, I wrote what I
meant. If classes 1:11 and 1:12
-A PREROUTING -p icmp -j MARK --set-mark 1
iptables -A FORWARD -p icmp -j MARK --set-mark 1
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -p icmp -j MARK --set-mark 1
With the following in my traffic shaping script:
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw
Heh heh heh - whoops. I've fixed it.
I changed the filter rule to:
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw
classid 1:2
And it worked. Sorry for posting such a silly mistake.
Many thanks,
Mark Lidstone
IT and Network Support Administrator
BMT SeaTech Ltd
something wrong here, please can someone point it out?
I hope this helps,
Mark Lidstone
IT and Network Support Administrator
BMT SeaTech Ltd
Grove House, Meridians Cross, 7 Ocean Way
Ocean Village, Southampton. SO14 3TJ. UK
Tel: +44 (0)23 8063 5122
Fax: +44 (0)23 8063 5144
E-Mail: mailto
.
Obviously I understand that the child classes could have varying rate
and ceil values to be tuned for whatever specific use someone wanted to
put them to, but this is simply a basic example.
Many thanks,
Mark Lidstone
IT and Network Support Administrator
BMT SeaTech Ltd
Grove House, Meridians
' bandwidth from other
classes under the same HTB qdisc, then classes with a given prio will
only be able to borrow bandwidth when classes with a lower prio have
nothing waiting
Is this correct?
Many thanks,
Mark Lidstone
IT and Network Support Administrator
BMT SeaTech Ltd
Grove House, Meridians Cross, 7
. If so, please point it out.
Many thanks for any information,
Mark Lidstone
IT and Network Support Administrator
BMT SeaTech Ltd
Grove House, Meridians Cross, 7 Ocean Way
Ocean Village, Southampton. SO14 3TJ. UK
Tel: +44 (0)23 8063 5122
Fax: +44 (0)23 8063 5144
E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL
ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 1.1.1.4/32 flowid 1:5
It's just a very simple 5-child HTB with pfifo queues.
I might split things down more later, but this should get things going.
It's just a pity that the ISP want to charge stupid amounts of money for
the shaping.
Many thanks,
Mark Lidstone
things
as memory efficient as possible.
Again, many thanks for clearing that up.
Mark Lidstone
IT and Network Support Administrator
BMT SeaTech Ltd
Grove House, Meridians Cross, 7 Ocean Way
Ocean Village, Southampton. SO14 3TJ. UK
Tel: +44 (0)23 8063 5122
Fax: +44 (0)23 8063 5144
E-Mail
on a
connection (the four sfq's at the bottom) and some video conferencing
equipment that needs priority over everything (the pfifo_fast). Have I
misunderstood anything vital here?
Many thanks,
Mark Lidstone
IT and Network Support Administrator
BMT SeaTech Ltd
Grove House, Meridians Cross, 7 Ocean Way
prio 0 u32 match ip src 1.2.3.7/32
flowid 8:0
$SF parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 0 u32 match ip src 1.2.3.8/32
flowid 9:0
(I've a horrible feeling there's something obviously and fundamentally
wrong with this)
What happens with any traffic not from these IPs?
Many thanks,
Mark Lidstone
Mark Williams (MWP) wrote:
Are you sure that FTP is going to class 22 and not default -
tc -s qdisc ls dev $INTERFACE or tc -s class ls dev $INTERFACE will show
counters.
I am. I graph using tc -s qdisc show dev ppp0 with rrdtool.
Ahh, I assume you patched and recompiled your
Mark Williams (MWP) wrote:
For now try making a parent with rate and ceil 220kbit.
Have 4 child/leaf classes like - (assuming 1 is highest priority)
class 1 rate 120 ceil 220 prio 0
class 2 rate 50 ceil 220 prio 1
class 3 rate 25 ceil 220 prio 2
class 4 rate 25 ceil 220 prio 3
On Friday 24 December 2004 08:42, Mark Williams (MWP) wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 17:52, Mark Williams (MWP) wrote:
As you can see class 25 has priority 8, so all other traffic should
get preference, which is not happening.
It almost seems like all the priorities
Mark Williams (MWP) wrote:
Ok.
My Linux (which is connected to the ADLS modem) box runs HTTP, FTP, etc
services and also runs bittorrent, edonkey,
etc.
I have two other PCs (both windows) which connect to the internet via the
Linux
box (MASQ).
Now, i want data like SSH, ICMP, DNS
all other traffic should get
preference, which is not happening.
It almost seems like all the priorities are reversed...
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Mark Williams.
___
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO
they are in the correct order.
Mark.
___
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
data over the same link.
Im finding that packet shaping is splitting the outbound bandwidth (256kbit)
equally between the two.
This is not what im after... want the windows box to take more bandwidth off
bittorrent than 50% like it is atm.
Does this explain my problem better?
Thanks!
Mark
sources (client PCs), rather
than
the iptables MARK system i want to use so i can organise local and client PC
traffic.
Does anyone know how i can do what im after?
Thanks,
Mark Williams.
___
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http
than
the iptables MARK system i want to use so i can organise local and client PC
traffic.
Does anyone know how i can do what im after?
Thanks,
Mark Williams.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Hi guys!
I am newbie in QoS. Trying to solve 1 problem.
Which queueing should i use(sfq, pfifo, red, ...), to allow my client to
get maximum in single session?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NMS-UANIC
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ppl
I have 5 adsl lines that after reading quite a bit
i managed to get load balanced now abvoiusly it doesnt load balance evenly and
this works on what routes are still in the routing cache. my question is my
outbound masquerading had to be modified to use snat in iptables instead of
Will the following commands limit my ftpserver upload speed on the
passive ports?
iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -m tcp -p tcp -s 192.168.1.101 --sport
5:6 -j MARK --set-mark 0x02
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate
Will the following commands limit my ftpserver upload speed on the
passive ports?
iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -m tcp -p tcp -s 192.168.1.101 --sport
5:6 -j MARK --set-mark 0x02
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate
-6 since they are my passive ftp
port range.
Or, ideally, I would like to limit proftpd itself...howeve there doesn't
seem to be a way to do that with linux. Windows can but I guess Linux
cant.
Is there a way to limit just ftp sends and leave everything else alone?
Mark
mark ryan wrote
:6
# low priority destination ports
NOPRIOPORTDST=
Mark
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
=eth1
# low priority OUTGOING traffic - you can leave this blank if you want
# low priority source netmasks
NOPRIOHOSTSRC=192.168.1.101
# low priority destination netmasks
NOPRIOHOSTDST=
# low priority source ports
NOPRIOPORTSRC=
# low priority destination ports
NOPRIOPORTDST=
Thanks,
Mark
my browsing speed.
Problem:
I don't see any difference with wondershaper running. I have tried all
different speeds and both eth0 and eth1 in wondershaper.
Am I doing something wrong? I am testing by pinging yahoo.com.
Mark
___
LARTC mailing list
not just the ftp server.
I want to be able to limit the ftp server traffic only.
Thanks,
Mark
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
traffic.and at around 220msec
with full upload traffic.
Mark
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
That is what i was afraid of. I have no idea how to re-compile the QoS
modules into the Xandros kernel.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Damion de Soto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mark Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC
still too
much of a linux newbie to be able to make my own kernel and have it work.
Mark
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Argument
many times.
Any ideas what is wrong?
MArk
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Does anyone know any software that runs under Linux that does a military
wipe, making file unreadable by deleting file then writing all ones and
zeros, when deleting files.
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 14:01:33 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Clarification required for Prio in CBQ dequeing order
Hi,
I have been modifying the Wonder shaper to include another queue. My
understanding was packets would be de queued to hardware
44 matches
Mail list logo
