Hi
is there any how-to which can guide me through all available tuning options
in /proc/ filesystem
Pozdrawiam
Szymon Turkiewicz
Hi
Hi
I have a router with a large number of iptables rules and some
extensive traffic shaping (HTB + RED + ... ) + conntrack.
Performance boost tips:
-
, at 9:48 PM, Mohan Sundaram wrote:
sAwAr wrote:
Hi
I believe that whole question is in topic. Is there any way to
recognize ( and then shape ) p2p traffic which is encrypted?
Modern p2p clients have this ability moreover some of them have
this enabled by default. Now I'm using ipp2p
Hi
I believe that whole question is in topic.
Is there any way to recognize ( and then shape ) p2p traffic which is encrypted?
Modern p2p clients have this ability moreover some of them have this enabled by
default.
Now I'm using ipp2p for iptables but as I know this doesn't recognize
Witam,
I had very big problem since last Friday. I noticed that clients with Windows
can't upload faster than ~140kB/s at one connection ( ftp http). It's quite
weird because when I do exactly the same test (the same server, time, computer,
client ip address, even switch and port) but on
almost empty? I
believe this situation can happen due to fact that load balancing is based on
flows and for example p2p or smpt/pop3 will eat whole upload.
If my problem isn't clear I'll try to explain it better later.
Thanks in advance.
Pozdrawiam
sawar
or only upload is used and other links are full. Does weights ensure that
upload and download on all links with different up/down speeds will be equally
loaded?
Pozdrawiam
sawar
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Jordi Segues wrote:
the above is actually covered in the wiki howto. Bu
Hi
I would like to ask you which processor is beter solution for router? Please
shortly explain why?
I have about 800 users. For each I create 2 htb classes and 4 filters.
Moreower router have dhcp serwer and lots of iptables rules.
I'm interested in P4 3Ghz HT and AMD Athlon 64 3000+.
hi for those who was fallowing this topic I can say that
IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED must be disabled! After few tests I'm quite sure that
this was cousing my problems. Now I'm using 2.5.15 kernel without patch of
Julian Anastasov and load-balancing is working.
lartc split-access how to and
That's your problem. The Linux box with multiple gateways needs nat. At
least that was a requirement back in the day. Pretty sure nothing has
change there. Part of what Julian's patches address as well.
When I had a setup like yours. I did two rounds of NAT/PAT. Once in each
of the routers,
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 11:27 +0200, sAwAr wrote:
That's your problem. The Linux box with multiple gateways needs nat. At
least that was a requirement back in the day. Pretty sure nothing has
change there. Part of what Julian's patches address as well.
When I had a setup like
Dnia wtorek, 28 marca 2006 19:06, William L. Thomson Jr. napisał:
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 18:58 +0200, sAwAr wrote:
According to:
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
This setup is responsible for sending answer with proper interface (witch
it comes).
Ignore it, it's
Hi,
while I was waiting for your reply i decided to read everything once more:
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#route
routes-2.6.14-12.diff - March 3, 2005. Patch containing all following parts
(applied in the same order), apply after disabling the
IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED config option
AND after
--eth0---80.48.56.70---80.48.56.65 ISP
|my |
router1
| |
|linux
13 matches
Mail list logo
