On Friday 22 of April 2005 01:34, you wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=95 ttl=64 time=89.0 ms
>
> Which is about 2 packets @ 256kbit. I tested and got the same behaviour
> with a simple setup, but max ping about 45 because htb dequeues in pairs
> by de
On Friday 22 of April 2005 01:34, you wrote:
> Which is about 2 packets @ 256kbit. I tested and got the same behaviour
> with a simple setup, but max ping about 45 because htb dequeues in pairs
> by default. If you change #define hysteresis from 1 to 0 in
> net/sched/sch_htb.c then it's more acc
j IMQ --todev 1
tc qdisc del root dev imq0
tc qdisc del root dev imq1
tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1 htb default 2
tc qdisc add dev imq1 root handle 1 htb default 2
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 12mbit burst 2k prio 1
quantum 2048
tc class add dev imq1 parent 1:0 class
hi all, i have tried out both IMQ and shaping transmit on 2 NICS downstream and
upstream respectively, which method is preferred in terms of accuracy,
stability etc
pls advise
tc
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman
hi all, i have applied all patches and compiled the kernel (2.4.21), iptables
(1.2.9) and iproute2 (2.4.7-now-ss020116) however when i run "modprobe imq
numdevs=1", the system returns - imq.o: init_module: Device or resource busy
the transcript is below -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] project]# modprobe imq
er, i didn't really read this whole thing, so this reply is probably
worthless, but...
> I have a server with two interfaces 128.187.2.0/16 and 128.187.1.0/16 that
> was setup by a vendor (I dont think there is any ip routing enabled).
doesn't 128.187.1.0/16 bleed into 128.187.2.0/16? i would
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Michel Angelo da Silva Pereira wrote:
>
> Hi, what's the diferences between HTB and CBQ?
>
the advanced routing & traffic control howto, as well as the htb site,
explain the answer to your query a few times over. check out:
cbq in the howto:
http://lartc.org/HOWTO//cv
