gypsy wrote:
>
> Thomas Graf wrote:
> >
>
> > Would you guys like to see esfq included in mainline?
>
> YES!!
>
> gypsy
Thomas,
Let me rephrase that.
I can't think of any reason that SFQ should be maintained without the E
. It makes very little sense to hard code parameters that the
user mi
Thomas Graf wrote:
>
> Would you guys like to see esfq included in mainline?
YES!!
gypsy
___
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Andy Furniss wrote:
Andy Furniss wrote:
my usb intelli mouse didn't work.
the 2.6.10-bk8 didn't autoload it
though,
Of course putting -bk8 on my /boot/System.map-2.6.10 will fix that ...
It didn't :-( but I tried more on 2.6.9 and found a u32 that works -
tc filter add dev eth0 parent : pri
Andy Furniss wrote:
my usb intelli mouse didn't
work.
the 2.6.10-bk8 didn't autoload it
though,
Of course putting -bk8 on my /boot/System.map-2.6.10 will fix that ...
Will try more tonight.
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://m
Andy Furniss wrote:
Thomas Graf wrote:
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 23:23
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT_POLICE?
I can't find it! neither can grep .config
Sorry, it's called CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE
OK - will be booting back into LFS to try soon.
Still no luck - I got build errors with bk8 (sam
Thomas Graf wrote:
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 23:23
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT_POLICE?
I can't find it! neither can grep .config
Sorry, it's called CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE
OK - will be booting back into LFS to try soon.
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing l
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 23:23
> >CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT_POLICE?
>
> I can't find it! neither can grep .config
Sorry, it's called CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE
___
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listin
Thomas Graf wrote:
You don't need bitkeeper, just download the .10 and the latest patch to
get to -bk8 then apply my patches.
tc filter add dev eth0 parent : protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src
0.0.0.0/0 police rate 100kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1
Works OK.
tc filter add dev eth0 parent fff
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 13:27
> Thomas Graf wrote:
> >* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 09:00
> >
> >>I retried with a vanilla 2.6.10 + iptables 1.2.11 on a different box and
> >>it is the same.
> >
> >
> >2 options:
> > 1) get latest -bk snapshot and apply
> > h
Thomas Graf wrote:
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 09:00
I retried with a vanilla 2.6.10 + iptables 1.2.11 on a different box and
it is the same.
2 options:
1) get latest -bk snapshot and apply
http://people.suug.ch/~tgr/patches/pending/
The patchset fixes a lot of small issue
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 09:00
> I retried with a vanilla 2.6.10 + iptables 1.2.11 on a different box and
> it is the same.
2 options:
1) get latest -bk snapshot and apply
http://people.suug.ch/~tgr/patches/pending/
The patchset fixes a lot of small issues, adds action
Andy Furniss wrote:
Thomas Graf wrote:
Do you see the police/action stats being updated? i.e. does
the matching itself work?
From memory yes - counters showed OK on iptables and tc -s qdisc ls dev
eth0 just no drops
I'll repeat tonight to be sure.
I retried with a vanilla 2.6.10 + iptables 1.2
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:59:44 +
Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE wrote:
Hello, Stephen, List!
Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark
in u32 filters.
The kernel part was included in 2.6.10.
Please apply!
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:59:44 +
Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE wrote:
> > Hello, Stephen, List!
> >
> > Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark
> > in u32 filters.
> > The kernel part was included in 2.6.10.
> >
> > Please
Thomas Graf wrote:
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-05 15:25
Thomas Graf wrote:
That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers
in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me)
Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended
match. Don't rely too much on it.
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-05 15:25
> Thomas Graf wrote:
> >>That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers
> >>in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me)
> >
> >
> >Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended
> >match. Don't rely too much on
Thomas Graf wrote:
That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers
in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me)
Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended
match. Don't rely too much on it.
I searched a bit around meta data recently but couldn't find much - do
> That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers
> in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me)
Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended
match. Don't rely too much on it.
Regarding fw, what exactly is not working? fw doesn't handle police
results properly
Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE wrote:
Hello, Stephen, List!
Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark
in u32 filters.
The kernel part was included in 2.6.10.
Please apply!
Thank you!
For more info:
- Kernel patch (not needed for 2.6.10):
http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/mar
Hello, Stephen, List!
Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark in
u32 filters.
The kernel part was included in 2.6.10.
Please apply!
Thank you!
For more info:
- Kernel patch (not needed for 2.6.10):
http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/mark_in_u32/net-match-nfmark-in-u32.
20 matches
Mail list logo