Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-07 Thread gypsy
gypsy wrote: > > Thomas Graf wrote: > > > > > Would you guys like to see esfq included in mainline? > > YES!! > > gypsy Thomas, Let me rephrase that. I can't think of any reason that SFQ should be maintained without the E . It makes very little sense to hard code parameters that the user mi

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-07 Thread gypsy
Thomas Graf wrote: > > Would you guys like to see esfq included in mainline? YES!! gypsy ___ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-07 Thread Andy Furniss
Andy Furniss wrote: Andy Furniss wrote: my usb intelli mouse didn't work. the 2.6.10-bk8 didn't autoload it though, Of course putting -bk8 on my /boot/System.map-2.6.10 will fix that ... It didn't :-( but I tried more on 2.6.9 and found a u32 that works - tc filter add dev eth0 parent : pri

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-07 Thread Andy Furniss
Andy Furniss wrote: my usb intelli mouse didn't work. the 2.6.10-bk8 didn't autoload it though, Of course putting -bk8 on my /boot/System.map-2.6.10 will fix that ... Will try more tonight. Andy. ___ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://m

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-06 Thread Andy Furniss
Andy Furniss wrote: Thomas Graf wrote: * Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 23:23 CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT_POLICE? I can't find it! neither can grep .config Sorry, it's called CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE OK - will be booting back into LFS to try soon. Still no luck - I got build errors with bk8 (sam

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-06 Thread Andy Furniss
Thomas Graf wrote: * Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 23:23 CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT_POLICE? I can't find it! neither can grep .config Sorry, it's called CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE OK - will be booting back into LFS to try soon. Andy. ___ LARTC mailing l

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-06 Thread Thomas Graf
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 23:23 > >CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT_POLICE? > > I can't find it! neither can grep .config Sorry, it's called CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE ___ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listin

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-06 Thread Andy Furniss
Thomas Graf wrote: You don't need bitkeeper, just download the .10 and the latest patch to get to -bk8 then apply my patches. tc filter add dev eth0 parent : protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 100kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 Works OK. tc filter add dev eth0 parent fff

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-06 Thread Thomas Graf
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 13:27 > Thomas Graf wrote: > >* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 09:00 > > > >>I retried with a vanilla 2.6.10 + iptables 1.2.11 on a different box and > >>it is the same. > > > > > >2 options: > > 1) get latest -bk snapshot and apply > > h

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-06 Thread Andy Furniss
Thomas Graf wrote: * Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 09:00 I retried with a vanilla 2.6.10 + iptables 1.2.11 on a different box and it is the same. 2 options: 1) get latest -bk snapshot and apply http://people.suug.ch/~tgr/patches/pending/ The patchset fixes a lot of small issue

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-06 Thread Thomas Graf
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-06 09:00 > I retried with a vanilla 2.6.10 + iptables 1.2.11 on a different box and > it is the same. 2 options: 1) get latest -bk snapshot and apply http://people.suug.ch/~tgr/patches/pending/ The patchset fixes a lot of small issues, adds action

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-06 Thread Andy Furniss
Andy Furniss wrote: Thomas Graf wrote: Do you see the police/action stats being updated? i.e. does the matching itself work? From memory yes - counters showed OK on iptables and tc -s qdisc ls dev eth0 just no drops I'll repeat tonight to be sure. I retried with a vanilla 2.6.10 + iptables 1.2

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-06 Thread Andy Furniss
Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:59:44 + Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE wrote: Hello, Stephen, List! Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark in u32 filters. The kernel part was included in 2.6.10. Please apply!

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:59:44 + Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE wrote: > > Hello, Stephen, List! > > > > Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark > > in u32 filters. > > The kernel part was included in 2.6.10. > > > > Please

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-05 Thread Andy Furniss
Thomas Graf wrote: * Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-05 15:25 Thomas Graf wrote: That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me) Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended match. Don't rely too much on it.

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-05 Thread Thomas Graf
* Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-01-05 15:25 > Thomas Graf wrote: > >>That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers > >>in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me) > > > > > >Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended > >match. Don't rely too much on

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-05 Thread Andy Furniss
Thomas Graf wrote: That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me) Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended match. Don't rely too much on it. I searched a bit around meta data recently but couldn't find much - do

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-05 Thread Thomas Graf
> That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers > in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me) Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended match. Don't rely too much on it. Regarding fw, what exactly is not working? fw doesn't handle police results properly

Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-05 Thread Andy Furniss
Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE wrote: Hello, Stephen, List! Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark in u32 filters. The kernel part was included in 2.6.10. Please apply! Thank you! For more info: - Kernel patch (not needed for 2.6.10): http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/mar

[LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32

2005-01-05 Thread Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
Hello, Stephen, List! Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark in u32 filters. The kernel part was included in 2.6.10. Please apply! Thank you! For more info: - Kernel patch (not needed for 2.6.10): http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/mark_in_u32/net-match-nfmark-in-u32.