hi sylvain,
yes it would!
cheers
charles
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 17:07 +0200, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> I've been looking around (kerneltrap, spennberg) and it looks like ipsec
> is broken for 2.6.11... that might be a good explanation for my unsolvable
> problem ;)
>
>
> Sylvain
>
>
>
>
I've been looking around (kerneltrap, spennberg) and it looks like ipsec
is broken for 2.6.11... that might be a good explanation for my unsolvable
problem ;)
Sylvain
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/
hi sylvain,
yea -- i'm a little lost here as well.
it appears that you have a tunnel and policy, therefore, i too am a bit
confused. counters reflect 0 in setkey -D ... traffic is not using the
tunnel.
if i were you, i would start with a simple tunnel (psk) and watch what
happens on each side wi
hi sylvain,
what does "setkey -D" say?
cheers
charles
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:16 +0200, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> On Jeu 28 avril 2005 9:50, lartc a écrit :
> > salut sylvain,
> >
> > to do your vpn, you'll need a little bit more policy (if you want to set
> > your policy manually). here's an
salut sylvain,
to do your vpn, you'll need a little bit more policy (if you want to set
your policy manually). here's an example shell script to set policy:
#!/sbin/setkey -f
flush;
spdflush;
#==ESP==
#| |
#Network Left --- G
Hi everyone,
First of all, this is my first post in this ML, so I'm not sure that this
is the right place for my question (please don't shoot me down ;)). For
the record, I've been reading and using LARTC for almost 3 years now, and
it's a great help for anyone who wants to learn linux networking.
