You would be better off if you could separate the LAN by using different
channels in the CATV system. Then you actually have a smaller network
and the physical and logical connectivity are identical. However, if
the memory of the router is sufficient to contain the large ARP table
and the ban
> > 2.4.22
> > That is why I try to use bogger gc_*
> > thanx for the links.. reading now..
>
> gc_* is of course the way to go and as I've stated before, I would
> rather think of a misconcepted network architecture when seing neighbour
> table overflows and fix that flaw instead of using arpd
from make config --> arpd -> help
This code is experimental and also obsolete.
.
2.4.22
That is why I try to use bogger gc_*
thanx for the links.. reading now..
> Hello,
>
> > yep, i'm using them, i needed to know the max and anyone experiencing
>
> Those are int and nothing in the
Hi,
from make config --> arpd -> help
This code is experimental and also obsolete.
.
Yeah well, such entries are sprinkled all over the kernel. Fact is that
it's still in the 2.6.x kernel series, which means that even though it
was thought to be experimental and obsolete, it has not bee
Hello,
yep, i'm using them, i needed to know the max and anyone experiencing
Those are int and nothing in the kernel code prevents them having
MAX_INT-1 assigned as a value. However you have a rather serious
networking problem anyway if you exceed the predefined gc* values.
Some more informatio
yep, i'm using them, i needed to know the max and anyone experiencing
problems with very big arp's
arpd is marked as depricated or so!?
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:49:23AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?! Does someone have very big
> > LANs with
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:46:09PM +0300, Nachko Halachev wrote:
> In case of big LAN ( more than 512 hosts ) you must use arpd daemon .
No, you don't have to, see my previous post.
Bye,
Peter Surda (Shurdeek) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ICQ 10236103, +436505122023
--
Where do you thi
In case of big LAN ( more than 512 hosts ) you must use arpd daemon .
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 10:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?!
> Does someone have very big LANs with linux-routers ? How big ? (i mean flat
> L2 network, not segmented)
>
> I want t
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:49:23AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?! Does someone have very big
> LANs with linux-routers ? How big ? (i mean flat L2 network, not segmented)
It is configurable with /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/default/gc_thresh{1,2,3}. I
d
what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?!
Does someone have very big LANs with linux-routers ? How big ? (i mean flat L2
network, not segmented)
I want to know how much can my net can scale ?
thanx
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
10 matches
Mail list logo
