Guillermo Gomez wrote:
By the way, what's the behaviour of multipath routing if one of the
providers goes down ? Should i take care manually to take it out from
the multipath ?
I think it will still try to be routed out the link that is down.
The linux kernel only removes routes if the actual eth
Got it, thanks Damion
It was so easy to think in using directly ethx:y in iptables :(
Anyway,my point is that i need to do SNAT in a three ISP environment
with multipath routing to balance the outgoing traffic.
So far i decided to go with separate Ethernet cards so i will go back to
the aliasing
On Thursday, 04 December 2003, at 11:06:58 -0400,
Guillermo Gomez wrote:
> Does anyone know if i can use ethernet aliases like eth0:1 in advanced
> routing like multipath routing in order to avoid to have nxEthernet
> interfaces in my Linux box.
>
I think it is always better to think "in ip terms
Hi Guillermo,
iptables just does not likes eth0:1 neither eth0:2, is this the right
behaviour of iptables or what? i read something about NAT in advance
routing engine but never used before and i'm little confuse on how it
works. Will it crash with iptables NAT engine?
As far as I know, the ethX
Thanks guys for such quick response :) coool
Well let me go deeper now with my routing issuess.
My desirable topology is:
LAN Linux Box eth0-- dsl router (dhcp)
eth0:1 -- Frame Router ISP1 (fixed ip range)
eth0:2 -- Frame Router ISP
Hi all
Does anyone know if i can use ethernet aliases like eth0:1 in advanced
routing like multipath routing in order to avoid to have nxEthernet
interfaces in my Linux box.
Thansk in advanced
--
Guillermo Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
neotech
___
LARTC
